Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25343512›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Gene expression analysis of E. coli strains provides insights into the role of gene regulation in diversification.

Marius Vital, Benli Chai, Bjørn Østman, James Cole, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis, James M Tiedje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrated genomic and functional analyses of human skin-associatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Genomic Metrics Applied toFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marius VitalCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Benli ChaiCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Bjørn ØstmanBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
James ColeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
James M TiedjeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Ulcerative ColitisUH3DK083993 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHANG, EUGENE B, MEYER, FOLKER · 2010 to 2012
$8.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK083993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli spans a genetic continuum from enteric strains to several phylogenetically distinct, atypical lineages that are rare in humans, but more common in extra-intestinal environments. To investigate the link between gene regulation, phylogeny and diversification in this species, we analyzed global gene expression profiles of four strains representing distinct evolutionary lineages, including a well-studied laboratory strain, a typical commensal (enteric) strain and two environmental strains. RNA-Seq was employed to compare the whole transcriptomes of strains grown under batch, chemostat and starvation conditions. Highly differentially expressed genes showed a significantly lower nucleotide sequence identity compared with other genes, indicating that gene regulation and coding sequence conservation are directly connected. Overall, distances between the strains based on gene expression profiles were largely dependent on the culture condition and did not reflect phylogenetic relatedness. Expression differences of commonly shared genes (all four strains) and E. coli core genes were consistently smaller between strains characterized by more similar primary habitats. For instance, environmental strains exhibited increased expression of stress defense genes under carbon-limited growth and entered a more pronounced survival-like phenotype during starvation compared with other strains, which stayed more alert for substrate scavenging and catabolism during no-growth conditions. Since those environmental strains show similar genetic distance to each other and to the other two strains, these findings cannot be simply attributed to genetic relatedness but suggest physiological adaptations. Our study provides new insights into ecologically relevant gene-expression and underscores the role of (differential) gene regulation for the diversification of the model bacterial species.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialPhylogenyEnvironmentEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGenome, BacterialHumansIntestinesSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25343512
PMCPMC4409157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.