Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25343359›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Single cell adhesion assay using computer controlled micropipette.

Rita Salánki, Csaba Hős, Norbert Orgovan, Beatrix Péter, Noémi Sándor, Zsuzsa Bajtay, Anna Erdei, Robert Horvath, Bálint Szabó

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rita SalánkiDoctoral School of Molecular- and Nanotechnologies, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary; Nanobiosensorics Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba HősDepartment of Hydrodynamic Systems, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Norbert OrgovanNanobiosensorics Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix PéterDoctoral School of Molecular- and Nanotechnologies, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary; Nanobiosensorics Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Budapest, Hungary.
Noémi SándorMTA-ELTE Immunology Research Group, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsa BajtayDepartment of Immunology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna ErdeiMTA-ELTE Immunology Research Group, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Immunology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Robert HorvathNanobiosensorics Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint SzabóNanobiosensorics Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary; CellSorter Company for Innovations, Budapest, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUInstitute for Technical Physics and Materials Science · HUUniversity of Pannonia · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell adhesion is a fundamental phenomenon vital for all multicellular organisms. Recognition of and adhesion to specific macromolecules is a crucial task of leukocytes to initiate the immune response. To gain statistically reliable information of cell adhesion, large numbers of cells should be measured. However, direct measurement of the adhesion force of single cells is still challenging and today's techniques typically have an extremely low throughput (5-10 cells per day). Here, we introduce a computer controlled micropipette mounted onto a normal inverted microscope for probing single cell interactions with specific macromolecules. We calculated the estimated hydrodynamic lifting force acting on target cells by the numerical simulation of the flow at the micropipette tip. The adhesion force of surface attached cells could be accurately probed by repeating the pick-up process with increasing vacuum applied in the pipette positioned above the cell under investigation. Using the introduced methodology hundreds of cells adhered to specific macromolecules were measured one by one in a relatively short period of time (∼30 min). We blocked nonspecific cell adhesion by the protein non-adhesive PLL-g-PEG polymer. We found that human primary monocytes are less adherent to fibrinogen than their in vitro differentiated descendants: macrophages and dendritic cells, the latter producing the highest average adhesion force. Validation of the here introduced method was achieved by the hydrostatic step-pressure micropipette manipulation technique. Additionally the result was reinforced in standard microfluidic shear stress channels. Nevertheless, automated micropipette gave higher sensitivity and less side-effect than the shear stress channel. Using our technique, the probed single cells can be easily picked up and further investigated by other techniques; a definite advantage of the computer controlled micropipette. Our experiments revealed the existence of a sub-population of strongly fibrinogen adherent cells appearing in macrophages and highly represented in dendritic cells, but not observed in monocytes.

Indexed as

ComputersAutomationCell AdhesionDendritic CellsFibrinogenHumansHydrodynamicsMacrophagesMicrofluidicsMonocytesNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysineShear StrengthSingle-Cell AnalysisFibrinogenPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysinepolylysine-graft-(poly(ethylene glycol))

Identifiers

PMID25343359
PMCPMC4208850
OpenAlexW1992917411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.