Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25342970›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2014

A truncated form of the Carbon catabolite repressor 1 increases cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei.

Thiago M Mello-de-Sousa, Rita Gorsche, Alice Rassinger, Marcio J Poças-Fonseca, Robert L Mach, Astrid R Mach-Aigner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of DNA Methylation inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Precision Engineering of the Transcription Factor Cre1 inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Engineering ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thiago M Mello-de-SousaDepartment for Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, A-1060 Wien, Austria.
Rita GorscheDepartment for Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, A-1060 Wien, Austria.
Alice RassingerDepartment for Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, A-1060 Wien, Austria.
Marcio J Poças-FonsecaDepartment of Genetics and Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, 70910-900 Brasília, DF Brazil.
Robert L MachDepartment for Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, A-1060 Wien, Austria.
Astrid R Mach-AignerDepartment for Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, A-1060 Wien, Austria.
TU Wien · ATUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24851Austrian Science Fund FWF V 232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRut-C30 is a cellulase-hyperproducing Trichoderma reesei strain and, consequently, became the ancestor of most industry strains used in the production of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes, in particular cellulases. Due to three rounds of undirected mutagenesis its genetic background differs from the wild-type QM6a in many ways, of which two are the lack of a 83 kb large sequence in scaffold 15 and the partial lack of the gene encoding the Carbon catabolite repressor 1 (CREI). However, it is still unclear, what exactly enhances cellulase production in Rut-C30.

resultsThe investigation of the expression of two genes encoding cellulases (cbh1 and cbh2) and the gene encoding their main transactivator (xyr1) revealed that the presence of the truncated form of CREI (CREI-96) contributes more to the Rut-C30 phenotype than a general loss of CREI-mediated carbon catabolite repression (cre1 deletion strain) or the deletion of 29 genes encoded in the scaffold 15 (83 kb deletion strain). We found that the remaining cre1 in Rut-C30 (cre1-96) is transcribed into mRNA, that its putative gene product (Cre1-96) is still able to bind DNA, and that the CREI-binding sites in the upstream regulatory regions of the chosen CREI-target genes are still protected in Rut-C30. As it was previously reported that CREI acts on the nucleosome positioning, we also analyzed chromatin accessibility of the core promoters of CREI-target genes and found them open even on D-glucose in the presence of CREI-96.

conclusionsThe lack of the full version of CREI in Rut-C30 corresponds with a partial release from carbon catabolite repression but is not completely explained by the lack of CREI. In contrast, the truncated CREI-96 of Rut-C30 exerts a positive regulatory influence on the expression of target genes. Mechanistically this might be explained at least partially by a CREI-96-mediated opening of chromatin.

Indexed as

Carbon catabolite repressor 1CellulasesChromatinHypocrea jecorinaRut-C30Trichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID25342970
PMCPMC4173072
OpenAlexW2157154645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.