ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2014
Influence of sex on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk and treatment outcomes.
Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexually dimorphic response to tobacco exposure in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the US: A Systematic Review of Nationally Representative Health Surveys.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Underrepresentation of Women in COPD Pharmacologic Trials Relative to Disease Burden: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Immunogenicity and safety of reduced-antigen tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccination in adults treated for obstructive airway diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Pooled it
- X chromosome associations with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and related phenotypes: an X chromosome-wide association study.Respiratory research · 2023Pooled it
- Gender-specific estimates of COPD prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Pooled it
- Motivations and experiences of patients with respiratory disease and their caregivers in a multinational trial of mirtazapine for severe breathlessness: a qualitative study (BETTER-B).BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Bronchodilator efficacy of extrafine glycopyrronium bromide: the Glyco 2 study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Trial
- Associations of current and life-course smoking and indoor environmental exposures with lung function level in early adulthood.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Periodontal Disease and Incident Chronic Bronchitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Parkinson's Disease and Respiratory Failure: Epidemiologic Insights of Two Decades From the CDC-WONDER Database.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Sex-, Age-, and Projection-Related Variability in Pneumothorax and Pulmonary Mass Detection Frequencies on Chest Radiographs: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trends in mortality with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the underlying cause and chronic kidney disease as a contributing cause among US adults, 1999-2020: a CDC WONDER analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Observational
- Article
- Sex and Gender in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Does It Matter?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Research frontiers and emerging trends in sex and gender differences in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prognostic models for mortality and hospitalisation risk in a contemporary Australian chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort.Respiratory research · 2026Article
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), one of the most common chronic diseases and a leading cause of death, has historically been considered a disease of men. However, there has been a rapid increase in the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality of COPD in women over the last two decades. This has largely been attributed to historical increases in tobacco consumption among women. But the influence of sex on COPD is complex and involves several other factors, including differential susceptibility to the effects of tobacco, anatomic, hormonal, and behavioral differences, and differential response to therapy. Interestingly, nonsmokers with COPD are more likely to be women. In addition, women with COPD are more likely to have a chronic bronchitis phenotype, suffer from less cardiovascular comorbidity, have more concomitant depression and osteoporosis, and have a better outcome with acute exacerbations. Women historically have had lower mortality with COPD, but this is changing as well. There are also differences in how men and women respond to different therapies. Despite the changing face of COPD, care providers continue to harbor a sex bias, leading to underdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis of COPD in women. In this review, we present the current knowledge on the influence of sex on COPD risk factors, epidemiology, diagnosis, comorbidities, treatment, and outcomes, and how this knowledge may be applied to improve clinical practices and advance research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.