Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25342513›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

A general mechanism for competitor-induced dissociation of molecular complexes.

Thayaparan Paramanathan, Daniel Reeves, Larry J Friedman, Jane Kondev, Jeff Gelles

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TDP-43 controls RNA structure through high affinity lattice interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. ADAPT-M: A workflow for rapid, quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. DNA Visualization Using Fluorescent Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thayaparan Paramanathan1] Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA [2] Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA [3] Department of Physics, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Daniel Reeves1] Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA [2] Department of Physics, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Larry J FriedmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Jane Kondev1] Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA [2] Department of Physics, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Jeff Gelles1] Department of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA [2] Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Brandeis University, PO Box 549110, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110, USA.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Single-molecule visualization of transcription regulation mechanismsR01GM081648 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFF GELLES · 2007 to 2026
$7.4M
BIOPHYSICS AND ENZYMOLOGY OF KINESIN MOVEMENTR01GM043369 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GELLES, JEFF · 1991 to 2001
$587k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043369NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081648NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM43369NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM81648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kinetic stability of non-covalent macromolecular complexes controls many biological phenomena. Here we find that physical models of complex dissociation predict that competitor molecules will, in general, accelerate the breakdown of isolated bimolecular complexes by occluding rapid rebinding of the two binding partners. This prediction is largely independent of molecular details. We confirm the prediction with single-molecule fluorescence experiments on a well-characterized DNA strand dissociation reaction. Contrary to common assumptions, competitor-induced acceleration of dissociation can occur in biologically relevant competitor concentration ranges and does not necessarily imply ternary association of competitor with the bimolecular complex. Thus, occlusion of complex rebinding may play a significant role in a variety of biomolecular processes. The results also show that single-molecule colocalization experiments can accurately measure dissociation rates despite their limited spatiotemporal resolution.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalKineticsMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID25342513
PMCPMC4301414
OpenAlexW2081172094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.