Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25342180›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Data standards to support health information exchange between poison control centers and emergency departments.

Guilherme Del Fiol, Barbara Insley Crouch, Mollie R Cummins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Providing a Population Based Registry Model of Drug Poisoning in Iran.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  2. Enabling health information exchange at a US Poison Control Center.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AMIA--Setting the Standard.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Barbara Insley CrouchCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Mollie R CumminsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

Electronic Exchange of Poisoning InformationR01HS021472 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CUMMINS, MOLLIE R. · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021472AHRQ HHS R01 HS21472-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePoison control centers (PCCs) routinely collaborate with emergency departments (EDs) to provide care for poison-exposed patients. During this process, a significant amount of information is exchanged between EDs and PCCs via telephone, leading to important inefficiencies and safety vulnerabilities. In the present work, we identified and assessed a set of data standards to enable a standards-based health information exchange process between EDs and PCCs. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on a reference model for PCC-ED health information exchange, we (1) mapped PCC-ED information exchange events to clinical documents specified in the Health Level Seven (HL7) Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) Standard, and (2) mapped information types routinely exchanged in PCC-ED telephone conversations to C-CDA sections.

resultsFour C-CDA document types were necessary to support the PCC-ED information exchange process: History & Physical Note, Consultation Note, Progress Note, and Discharge Summary. Information types that are commonly exchanged between PCCs and EDs can be reasonably well represented within these C-CDA documents.

conclusionsA standards-based health information exchange process between PCCs and EDs appears to be feasible given a set of clinical data standards that are required for EHR certification in the USA, although the proposed approach still needs to be validated in actual system implementations. Such a process has the potential to improve the safety and efficiency of PCC-ED communication, ultimately resulting in improved patient care outcomes.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoison Control CentersCooperative BehaviorHealth Information Exchangeclinical decision-makingelectronic health recordshealth information exchangepoison control

Identifiers

PMID25342180
PMCPMC11749303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.