ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2014
Understanding the effects on constitutive activation and drug binding of a D130N mutation in the β2 adrenergic receptor via molecular dynamics simulation.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural heterogeneity of the μ-opioid receptor's conformational ensemble in the apo state.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are currently one of the largest families of drug targets. The constitutive activation induced by mutation of key GPCR residues is associated closely with various diseases. However, the structural basis underlying such activation and its role in drug binding has remained unclear. Herein, we used all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations to study the effects of a D130N mutation on the structure of β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and its binding of the agonist salbutamol. The results indicate that the mutation caused significant changes in some key helices. In particular, the mutation leads to the departure of transmembrane 3 (TM3) from transmembrane 6 (TM6) and marked changes in the NPxxY region as well as the complete disruption of a key ionic lock, all of which contribute to the observed constitutive activation. In addition, the D130N mutation weakens some important H-bonds, leading to structural changes in these regions. Binding free energy calculations indicate that van der Waals and electrostatic interactions are the main driving forces in binding salbutamol; however, binding strength in the mutant β2AR is significantly enhanced mainly through modifying electrostatic interactions. Further analysis revealed that the increase in binding energy upon mutation stems mainly from the H-bonds formed between the hydroxyl group of salbutamol and the serine residues of TM5. This observation suggests that modifications of the H-bond groups of this drug could significantly influence drug efficacy in the treatment of diseases associated with this mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25342155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.