Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25341919›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

Recombination and replication.

Aisha H Syeda, Michelle Hawkins, Peter McGlynn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hachiman is a genome integrity sensor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Super-resolution mapping of cellular double-strand break resection complexes during homologous recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. NoxO1 Knockout Promotes Longevity in Mice.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aisha H SyedaDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Michelle HawkinsDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Peter McGlynnDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
University of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014826/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The links between recombination and replication have been appreciated for decades and it is now generally accepted that these two fundamental aspects of DNA metabolism are inseparable: Homologous recombination is essential for completion of DNA replication and vice versa. This review focuses on the roles that recombination enzymes play in underpinning genome duplication, aiding replication fork movement in the face of the many replisome barriers that challenge genome stability. These links have many conserved features across all domains of life, reflecting the conserved nature of the substrate for these reactions, DNA.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticRecombination, GeneticDNADNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityHomologous RecombinationDNA

Identifiers

PMID25341919
PMCPMC4413237
OpenAlexW2051478798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.