ArticleDiabetologia2015
Racial and ethnic disparities in extremes of fetal growth after gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Diabetologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of exercise intervention on gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Pre-pregnancy underweight and obesity are positively associated with small-for-gestational-age infants in a Chinese population.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in migrant women with gestational diabetes. A retrospective cohort study in Italy.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Mediating effects of maternal blood lipids and glucose on the relationship between pre-pregnancy body mass index and newborn birth weight in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Dual Risk of Small and Large for Gestational Age: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Risk factors and prediction model for low-birth-weight infants born to women with gestational diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Diabetes in Pregnancy for Mothers and Offspring: Reflection on 30 Years of Clinical and Translational Research: The 2022 Norbert Freinkel Award Lecture.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- The Impact of Ethnicity on Fetal and Maternal Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Article
- The mediating role of gestational diabetes mellitus in the associations of maternal prepregnancy body mass index with neonatal birth weight.Journal of diabetes · 2022Article
- The Effects of Childbirth Age on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women.Iranian journal of public health · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe aim of this study was to assess and compare risks of having large- or small-for gestational age (LGA and SGA, respectively) infants born to women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) from ten racial/ethnic groups.
methodsLGA and SGA were defined as birthweight >90th and <10th percentile, respectively, specific to each racial/ethnic population and infant sex. Risks of LGA and SGA were compared among a retrospective cohort of 29,544 GDM deliveries from Hispanic, non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB), Filipino, Chinese, Asian Indian, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese and Pacific Islander (PI) groups of women.
resultsUnadjusted LGA and SGA risks varied among the ten groups. For LGA, the highest risk was in infants born to NHB women (17.2%), followed by those born to PI (16.2%), Hispanic (14.5%), NHW (13.1%), Asian Indian (12.8%), Filipino (11.6%) and other Asian (9.6-11.1%) women (p < 0.0001). Compared with NHW, the LGA risk was significantly greater for NHB women with GDM (RR 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]; p = 0.0001 after adjustment for maternal characteristics). Further adjustment for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain in the sub-cohort with available data (n = 8,553) greatly attenuated the elevated LGA risk for NHB women. For SGA, the risks ranged from 5.6% to 11.3% (p = 0.003) where most groups (8/10) had risks that were lower than the population-expected 10% and risks were not significantly different from those in NHW women. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThese data suggest that variation in extremes of fetal growth associated with GDM deliveries across race/ethnicity can be explained by maternal characteristics, maternal obesity and gestational weight gain. Women should be advised to target a normal weight and appropriate weight gain for pregnancies; this is particularly important for NHB women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.