ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2014
Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.
Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06391749 (K-ACCELERATE), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
K-ACCELERATE: A Multi-center Prospective Trial to Evaluate Clinical Utility of Multi Cancer Early Detection Test as a Triage Test for Symptomatic Participants
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards optimized CT lung cancer screening scan protocols.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of AI Models in Predicting Treatment Strategies for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Skin Cancer Pathobiology at a Glance: A Focus on Imaging Techniques and Their Potential for Improved Diagnosis and Surveillance in Clinical Cohorts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Visualizing the Invisible: Invisible Waste in Diagnostic Imaging.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Overview, Rationale of Screening, and Screening Economics.Academic radiology · 2021Review
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: concepts and controversies.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018Review
- Avoiding fears and promoting shared decision-making: How should physicians inform patients about radiation exposure from imaging tests?PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe goals of this article are to provide an overview of controversial aspects of imaging-based screening and to elucidate potential risks that may offset anticipated benefits.
conclusionCurrent controversial topics associated with imaging-based screening include false-positive results, incidental findings, overdiagnosis, radiation risks, and costs. Alongside the benefits of screening, radiologists should be prepared to discuss these additional diagnostic consequences with providers and patients to better guide shared decision making regarding imaging-based screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.