Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25340767›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Chromatin loops as allosteric modulators of enhancer-promoter interactions.

Boryana Doyle, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Maxim Imakaev, Leonid A Mirny

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COPD-Lung Cancer Comorbidity: Mechanistic Insights and Precision Oncology Implications.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Theory of chromatin organization maintained by active loop extrusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boryana DoyleProgram for Research in Mathematics, Engineering and Science for High School Students, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Geoffrey FudenbergGraduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Maxim ImakaevDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Leonid A MirnyDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USHarvard University · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143874 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CHAKRABORTY, ARUP K. · 2009 to 2013
$15.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143874NCI NIH HHS U54-CA143874-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classic model of eukaryotic gene expression requires direct spatial contact between a distal enhancer and a proximal promoter. Recent Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) studies show that enhancers and promoters are embedded in a complex network of looping interactions. Here we use a polymer model of chromatin fiber to investigate whether, and to what extent, looping interactions between elements in the vicinity of an enhancer-promoter pair can influence their contact frequency. Our equilibrium polymer simulations show that a chromatin loop, formed by elements flanking either an enhancer or a promoter, suppresses enhancer-promoter interactions, working as an insulator. A loop formed by elements located in the region between an enhancer and a promoter, on the contrary, facilitates their interactions. We find that different mechanisms underlie insulation and facilitation; insulation occurs due to steric exclusion by the loop, and is a global effect, while facilitation occurs due to an effective shortening of the enhancer-promoter genomic distance, and is a local effect. Consistently, we find that these effects manifest quite differently for in silico 3C and microscopy. Our results show that looping interactions that do not directly involve an enhancer-promoter pair can nevertheless significantly modulate their interactions. This phenomenon is analogous to allosteric regulation in proteins, where a conformational change triggered by binding of a regulatory molecule to one site affects the state of another site.

Indexed as

ChromatinComputational BiologyEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein ConformationChromatin

Identifiers

PMID25340767
PMCPMC4207457
OpenAlexW2138438730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.