ArticlePloS one2014
Using uncertainty and sensitivity analyses in socioecological agent-based models to improve their analytical performance and policy relevance.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Complex Systems Approaches to Diet: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Histology-guided mathematical model of tumor oxygenation: sensitivity analysis of physical and computational parameters.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A description and sensitivity analysis of the ArchMatNet agent-based model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- A vector-agent approach to (spatiotemporal) movement modelling and reasoning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Two sides of the same leader: an agent-based model to analyze the effect of ambivalent opinion leaders in social networks.Journal of computational social science · 2022Article
- Application of Machine Learning Techniques to an Agent-Based Model ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- A cyberGIS approach to spatiotemporally explicit uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis for agent-based modeling of vector-borne disease transmission.Annals of the American Association of Geographers · 2020Article
- High-resolution computational modeling of immune responses in the gut.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Using Multiple Scale Space-Time Patterns in Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis for Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Models.Computers, environment and urban systems · 2019Article
- Agent-Based Modeling in Public Health: Current Applications and Future Directions.Annual review of public health · 2018Review
- Lost in Translation: Piloting a Novel Framework to Assess the Challenges in Translating Scientific Uncertainty From Empirical Findings to WHO Policy Statements.International journal of health policy and management · 2017Article
- Predicting the impact of combined therapies on myeloma cell growth using a hybrid multi-scale agent-based model.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Sensitivity Analysis of an ENteric Immunity SImulator (ENISI)-Based Model of Immune Responses to Helicobacter pylori Infection.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agent-based models (ABMs) have been widely used to study socioecological systems. They are useful for studying such systems because of their ability to incorporate micro-level behaviors among interacting agents, and to understand emergent phenomena due to these interactions. However, ABMs are inherently stochastic and require proper handling of uncertainty. We propose a simulation framework based on quantitative uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to build parsimonious ABMs that serve two purposes: exploration of the outcome space to simulate low-probability but high-consequence events that may have significant policy implications, and explanation of model behavior to describe the system with higher accuracy. The proposed framework is applied to the problem of modeling farmland conservation resulting in land use change. We employ output variance decomposition based on quasi-random sampling of the input space and perform three computational experiments. First, we perform uncertainty analysis to improve model legitimacy, where the distribution of results informs us about the expected value that can be validated against independent data, and provides information on the variance around this mean as well as the extreme results. In our last two computational experiments, we employ sensitivity analysis to produce two simpler versions of the ABM. First, input space is reduced only to inputs that produced the variance of the initial ABM, resulting in a model with output distribution similar to the initial model. Second, we refine the value of the most influential input, producing a model that maintains the mean of the output of initial ABM but with less spread. These simplifications can be used to 1) efficiently explore model outcomes, including outliers that may be important considerations in the design of robust policies, and 2) conduct explanatory analysis that exposes the smallest number of inputs influencing the steady state of the modeled system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.