Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25340565›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Examination of prokaryotic multipartite genome evolution through experimental genome reduction.

George C diCenzo, Allyson M MacLean, Branislava Milunovic, G Brian Golding, Turlough M Finan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative genomic analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling the Functions of Two RpoNs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mobile gene clusters and coexpressed plant-rhizobium pathways drive partner quality variation in symbiosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptomic Response ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bipartite Genomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. DNA Methylation inmSystems · 2022
    Article
  19. What makes a megaplasmid?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Why are rhizobial symbiosis genes mobile?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George C diCenzoDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Allyson M MacLeanDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Branislava MilunovicDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
G Brian GoldingDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Turlough M FinanDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bacteria carry two or more chromosome-like replicons. This occurs in pathogens such as Vibrio cholerea and Brucella abortis as well as in many N2-fixing plant symbionts including all isolates of the alfalfa root-nodule bacteria Sinorhizobium meliloti. Understanding the evolution and role of this multipartite genome organization will provide significant insight into these important organisms; yet this knowledge remains incomplete, in part, because technical challenges of large-scale genome manipulations have limited experimental analyses. The distinct evolutionary histories and characteristics of the three replicons that constitute the S. meliloti genome (the chromosome (3.65 Mb), pSymA megaplasmid (1.35 Mb), and pSymB chromid (1.68 Mb)) makes this a good model to examine this topic. We transferred essential genes from pSymB into the chromosome, and constructed strains that lack pSymB as well as both pSymA and pSymB. This is the largest reduction (45.4%, 3.04 megabases, 2866 genes) of a prokaryotic genome to date and the first removal of an essential chromid. Strikingly, strains lacking pSymA and pSymB (ΔpSymAB) lost the ability to utilize 55 of 74 carbon sources and various sources of nitrogen, phosphorous and sulfur, yet the ΔpSymAB strain grew well in minimal salts media and in sterile soil. This suggests that the core chromosome is sufficient for growth in a bulk soil environment and that the pSymA and pSymB replicons carry genes with more specialized functions such as growth in the rhizosphere and interaction with the plant. These experimental data support a generalized evolutionary model, in which non-chromosomal replicons primarily carry genes with more specialized functions. These large secondary replicons increase the organism's niche range, which offsets their metabolic burden on the cell (e.g. pSymA). Subsequent co-evolution with the chromosome then leads to the formation of a chromid through the acquisition of functions core to all niches (e.g. pSymB).

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialChromosomes, BacterialEcologyGenomicsMedicago sativaPlasmidsRepliconSinorhizobium

Identifiers

PMID25340565
PMCPMC4207669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.