Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339914›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2014

Alcohol screening and brief intervention in workplace settings and social services: a comparison of literature.

Bernd Schulte, Amy Jane O'Donnell, Sinja Kastner, Christiane Sybille Schmidt, Ingo Schäfer, Jens Reimer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernd SchulteCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University , Hamburg , Germany.
Amy Jane O'DonnellInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University , Newcastle , UK.
Sinja KastnerCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University , Hamburg , Germany.
Christiane Sybille SchmidtCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University , Hamburg , Germany.
Ingo SchäferCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University , Hamburg , Germany.
Jens ReimerCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg University , Hamburg , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe robust evidence base for the effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief interventions (ASBIs) in primary health care (PHC) suggests that a widespread expansion of ASBI in non-medical settings could be beneficial. Social service and criminal justice settings work frequently with persons with alcohol use disorders, and workplace settings can be an appropriate setting for the implementation of alcohol prevention programs, as a considerable part of their social interactions takes place in this context.

methodsUpdate of two systematic reviews on ASBI effectiveness in workplaces, social service, and criminal justice settings. Review to identify implementation barriers and facilitators and future research needs of ASBI in non-medical settings.

resultsWe found a limited number of randomized controlled trials in non-medical settings with an equivocal evidence of effectiveness of ASBI. In terms of barriers and facilitators to implementation, the heterogeneity of non-medical settings makes it challenging to draw overarching conclusions. In the workplace, employee concerns with regard to the consequences of self-disclosure appear to be key. For social services, the complexity of certain client needs suggest that a stepped and carefully tailored approach is likely to be required. DISCUSSION: Compared to PHC, the reviewed settings are far more heterogeneous in terms of client groups, external conditions, and the focus on substance use disorders. Thus, future research should try to systematize these differences, and consider their implications for the deliverability, acceptance, and potential effectiveness of ASBI for different target groups, organizational frameworks, and professionals.

Indexed as

brief alcohol interventioncriminal justice settingsocial servicesworkplace health

Identifiers

PMID25339914
PMCPMC4186263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.