ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2014
Primate comparative neuroscience using magnetic resonance imaging: promises and challenges.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Limbic-Frontal Connectome across the Primate Order: Conservation of Connections and Implications for Translational Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- The prefrontal operculum, a human-specific hub for the cognitive control of speech.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Comparing mouse and human cingulate cortex organization using functional connectivity.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- A map of white matter tracts in a lesser ape, the lar gibbon.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic comparative analysis of the cerebello-cerebral system in 34 species highlights primate-general expansion of cerebellar crura I-II.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Striatonigrostriatal connectivity-based cross-species parcellation of human and macaque substantia nigra.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Mapping cross-species connectome atlas of human and macaque striatum.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Social isolation and the brain in the pandemic era.Nature human behaviour · 2022Review
- Comparing human and chimpanzee temporal lobe neuroanatomy reveals modifications to human language hubs beyond the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Cortical Morphology and White Matter Tractography of Three Phylogenetically Distant Primates: Evidence for a Simian Elaboration.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Article
- Diffusion MRI data, sulcal anatomy, and tractography for eight species from the Primate Brain Bank.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Chimpanzee histology and functional brain imaging show that the paracingulate sulcus is not human-specific.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Cross-species neuroscience: closing the explanatory gap.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- A comprehensive atlas of white matter tracts in the chimpanzee.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Cross-species functional alignment reveals evolutionary hierarchy within the connectome.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primate comparative anatomy is an established field that has made rich and substantial contributions to neuroscience. However, the labor-intensive techniques employed mean that most comparisons are often based on a small number of species, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. In this review we explore how new developments in magnetic resonance imaging have the potential to apply comparative neuroscience to a much wider range of species, allowing it to realize an even greater potential. We discuss (1) new advances in the types of data that can be acquired, (2) novel methods for extracting meaningful measures from such data that can be compared between species, and (3) methods to analyse these measures within a phylogenetic framework. Together these developments will allow researchers to characterize the relationship between different brains, the ecological niche they occupy, and the behavior they produce in more detail than ever before.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.