Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339821›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis.

Heng-Fu Lin, Hong-Shiee Lai, I-Rue Lai

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aspiration versus peritoneal lavage in appendicitis: a meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Partial cecum resection using endostapler in acute complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base necrosis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Geographic Variation in Appendiceal Perforation Rates in Canada: a Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  14. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heng-Fu LinHeng-Fu Lin, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220, Taiwan.
Hong-Shiee LaiHeng-Fu Lin, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220, Taiwan.
I-Rue LaiHeng-Fu Lin, Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220, Taiwan.
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of laparoscopy has been established in improving perioperative and postoperative outcomes for patients with simple appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with less wound pain, less wound infection, a shorter hospital stay, and faster overall recovery when compared to the open appendectomy for uncomplicated cases. In the past two decades, the use of laparoscopy for the treatment of perforated appendicitis to take the advantages of minimally invasiveness has increased. This article reviewed the prevalence, approaches, safety disclaimers, perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of patients with perforated appendicitis. Special issues including the conversion, interval appendectomy, laparoscopic approach for elderly or obese patient are also discussed to define the role of laparoscopic treatment for patients with perforated appendicitis.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAge FactorsAppendectomyAppendicitisCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansObesityPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCostIntra-abdominal abscessLaparoscopic appendectomyPerforation

Identifiers

PMID25339821
PMCPMC4202363
OpenAlexW2002388865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.