Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339816›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration and useful ancillary methods.

Mario Tadic, Tajana Stoos-Veic, Rajko Kusec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario TadicMario Tadic, Department of Gastroenterology, Dubrava University Hospital Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10040 Zagreb, Croatia.
Tajana Stoos-VeicMario Tadic, Department of Gastroenterology, Dubrava University Hospital Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10040 Zagreb, Croatia.
Rajko KusecMario Tadic, Department of Gastroenterology, Dubrava University Hospital Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, 10040 Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in evaluating pancreatic pathology has been well documented from the beginning of its clinical use. High spatial resolution and the close proximity to the evaluated organs within the mediastinum and abdominal cavity allow detection of small focal lesions and precise tissue acquisition from suspected lesions within the reach of this method. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is considered of additional value to EUS and is performed to obtain tissue diagnosis. Tissue acquisition from suspected lesions for cytological or histological analysis allows, not only the differentiation between malignant and non-malignant lesions, but, in most cases, also the accurate distinction between the various types of malignant lesions. It is well documented that the best results are achieved only if an adequate sample is obtained for further analysis, if the material is processed in an appropriate way, and if adequate ancillary methods are performed. This is a multi-step process and could be quite a challenge in some cases. In this article, we discuss the technical aspects of tissue acquisition by EUS-guided-FNA (EUS-FNA), as well as the role of an on-site cytopathologist, various means of specimen processing, and the selection of the appropriate ancillary method for providing an accurate tissue diagnosis and maximizing the yield of this method. The main goal of this review is to alert endosonographers, not only to the different possibilities of tissue acquisition, namely EUS-FNA, but also to bring to their attention the importance of proper sample processing in the evaluation of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and other accessible organs. All aspects of tissue acquisition (needles, suction, use of stylet, complications, etc.) have been well discussed lately. Adequate tissue samples enable comprehensive diagnoses, which answer the main clinical questions, thus enabling targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationBiomarkersCytogenetic AnalysisFlow CytometryHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunophenotypingMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersAncillary studiesEndoscopic ultrasoundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirationEndoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisitionFine needle aspiration cytologyFlow cytometry immunophenotypingMolecular testing

Identifiers

PMID25339816
PMCPMC4202358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.