ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning HRNet FCN for blood vessel identification in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy-An Initial Single-Institution Experience with a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of conversion at time of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative and long-term outcomes: Review of the National Cancer Database.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2023Article
- Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Comparison of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary nonampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Registrar performance in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and effects on postoperative outcomes.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- A novel hydrogel sheet prevents postoperative pancreatic fistula in a rat model.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2019Review
- Robotic and laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas: an historical review.BMC biomedical engineering · 2019Review
- LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT SPLEEN PRESERVATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019Article
- LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH SPLEEN PRESERVATION.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2018Article
- Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic pancreatic resections in two medium-sized medical centres.Updates in surgery · 2018Article
- A Modified Technique for Laparoscopic Spleen Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.Case reports in surgery · 2018Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2017Review
- Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of minimally invasive approaches to pancreatic resection for benign and malignant diseases has been growing in the last two decades. Studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is feasible and safe, and many of them show that compared to open distal pancreatectomy, LDP has decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay, and equivalent post-operative complication rates and short-term oncologic outcomes. LDP is becoming the procedure of choice for benign or small low-grade malignant lesions in the distal pancreas. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has not yet been widely adopted. There is no clear evidence in favor of MIPD over open pancreaticoduodenectomy in operative time, blood loss, length of stay or rate of complications. Robotic surgery has recently been applied to pancreatectomy, and many of the advantages of laparoscopy over open surgery have been observed in robotic surgery. Laparoscopic enucleation is considered safe for patients with small, benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas that is amenable to parenchyma-preserving procedure. As surgeons' experience with advanced laparoscopic and robotic skills has been growing around the world, new innovations and breakthrough in minimally invasive pancreatic procedures will evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.