ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014
Evidence for a genetic basis of urogenital carcinoma in the wild California sea lion.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory Pseudotumour in Common Seal (Phoca vitulina): A Case Report.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Article
- Pleural mesothelioma in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2023Article
- Article
- Unlocking the Role of a Genital Herpesvirus, Otarine Herpesvirus 1, in California Sea Lion Cervical Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Transcriptional Profiles of California Sea Lion Peripheral NK and CDFrontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Cancer in wildlife: patterns of emergence.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018Review
- Genetic diversity, inbreeding and cancer.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Review
- No evidence for clonal transmission of urogenital carcinoma in California sea lions (Wellcome open research · 2017Article
- Transformation of the genital epithelial tract occurs early in California sea lion development.Royal Society open science · 2016Article
- Common cancer in a wild animal: the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) as an emerging model for carcinogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although neoplasia is a major cause of mortality in humans and domestic animals, it has rarely been described in wildlife species. One of the few examples is a highly prevalent urogenital carcinoma in California sea lions (CSLs). Although the aetiology of this carcinoma is clearly multifactorial, inbreeding depression, as estimated using levels of microsatellite multilocus heterozygosity, is identified as predictive for this neoplasia. On further analysis, this relationship appears to be largely driven by one marker, suggesting that a single locus might be associated with the occurrence of this disease in CSLs. In a case-control study, carcinoma was significantly associated with homozygosity at the Pv11 microsatellite locus. Pv11 was mapped to intron 9 of the heparanase 2 gene (HPSE2) locus, a very large gene encoding heparanase 2, which in humans is associated with multiple carcinomas. Correspondingly, immunohistochemical labelling in tissues was present in carcinoma cases within a single homozygous Pv11 genotype. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an individual locus being associated with cancer in any wildlife species. This adds emphasis to the study of HPSE2 in other species, including humans and will guide future studies on this sentinel species that shares much of its diet and environment with humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.