ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015
Value and probability coding in a feedback-based learning task utilizing food rewards.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of the neural substrates of monetary reward anticipation and outcome in alcohol use disorder.Human brain mapping · 2023Pooled it
- Subcortical shape alterations in major depressive disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group.Human brain mapping · 2022Pooled it
- Prefrontal-Amygdala Pathways for Object and Social Value Representation.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Nucleus Accumbens Volume and Youth Tobacco or Marijuana Use Following Stressful Life Events.Journal of mental health & clinical psychology · 2024Article
- Neural Correlates Underlying Social-Cue-Induced Value Change.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Endocannabinoid signaling of homeostatic status modulates functional connectivity in reward and salience networks.Psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Did It Change Your Mind? Neural Substrates of Purchase Intention Change and Product Information.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Value network engagement and effects of memory-related processing during encoding and retrieval of value.Brain and cognition · 2021Article
- Nucleus Accumbens Functional Connectivity with the Frontoparietal Network Predicts Subsequent Change in Body Mass Index for American Children.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Substance use is associated with reduced devaluation sensitivity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Review
- Functional Connectivity Within the Gustatory Network Is Altered by Fat Content and Oral Fat Sensitivity - A Pilot Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Reduced dorsal striatal gray matter volume predicts implicit suicidal ideation in adolescents.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018Article
- Individual differences in dopamine DCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Increased BOLD Signals in dlPFC Is Associated With Stronger Self-Control in Food-Related Decision-Making.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Modulation of ventral striatal activity by cognitive effort.NeuroImage · 2017Article
- Reward-Induced Eating: Therapeutic Approaches to Addressing Food Cravings.Advances in therapy · 2016Review
- Effects of early life stress on amygdala and striatal development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2016Review
- Dissociating contributions of ventral and dorsal striatum to reward learning.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the consequences of our actions to guide behavior, the brain must represent different types of outcome-related information. For example, an outcome can be construed as negative because an expected reward was not delivered or because an outcome of low value was delivered. Thus behavioral consequences can differ in terms of the information they provide about outcome probability and value. We investigated the role of the striatum in processing probability-based and value-based negative feedback by training participants to associate cues with food rewards and then employing a selective satiety procedure to devalue one food outcome. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined brain activity related to receipt of expected rewards, receipt of devalued outcomes, omission of expected rewards, omission of devalued outcomes, and expected omissions of an outcome. Nucleus accumbens activation was greater for rewarding outcomes than devalued outcomes, but activity in this region did not correlate with the probability of reward receipt. Activation of the right caudate and putamen, however, was largest in response to rewarding outcomes relative to expected omissions of reward. The dorsal striatum (caudate and putamen) at the time of feedback also showed a parametric increase correlating with the trialwise probability of reward receipt. Our results suggest that the ventral striatum is sensitive to the motivational relevance, or subjective value, of the outcome, while the dorsal striatum codes for a more complex signal that incorporates reward probability. Value and probability information may be integrated in the dorsal striatum, to facilitate action planning and allocation of effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.