Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339393›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Multicentric comparative assessment of the bio-evolution Toxoplasma gondii detection kit with eight laboratory-developed PCR assays for molecular diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis.

Denis Filisetti, Yvon Sterkers, Marie-Pierre Brenier-Pinchart, Sophie Cassaing, Frédéric Dalle, Laurence Delhaes, Hervé Pelloux, Fériel Touafek, Emmanuelle Varlet-Marie, Hélène Yera and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Multicenter evaluation of theJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. HIV-Related Cerebral Toxoplasmosis Revisited: Current Concepts and Controversies of an Old Disease.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Denis FilisettiInstitut de Parasitologie et de Pathologie Tropicale, Université de Strasbourg, Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Mycologie Médicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Yvon SterkersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) of Montpellier/University Montpellier I, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, UMR CNRS 5290/IRD 224/UM, Montpellier, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Pierre Brenier-PinchartCHU A. Michallon/University Joseph Fourier Grenoble I, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Département des Agents Infectieux, Grenoble, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Sophie CassaingCHU of Toulouse, Service de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Toulouse, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric DalleCHU of Dijon, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Faculty of Medicine, Dijon, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Laurence DelhaesCHU of Lille/University Nord de France (UDSL), Service de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Faculty of Medicine, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Hervé PellouxCHU A. Michallon/University Joseph Fourier Grenoble I, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Département des Agents Infectieux, Grenoble, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Fériel TouafekAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Paris, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuelle Varlet-MarieCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) of Montpellier/University Montpellier I, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, UMR CNRS 5290/IRD 224/UM, Montpellier, France University Montpellier 1, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratoire de Biophysique & Bioanalyse, Montpellier, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Hélène YeraUniversité Paris-Descartes, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Paris, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France.
Ermano CandolfiInstitut de Parasitologie et de Pathologie Tropicale, Université de Strasbourg, Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Mycologie Médicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Patrick BastienCentre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) of Montpellier/University Montpellier I, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, UMR CNRS 5290/IRD 224/UM, Montpellier, France Pôle Biologie Moléculaire du Centre National de Référence de la Toxoplasmose, Montpellier, France p-bastien@chu-montpellier.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of Toxoplasma gondii in amniotic fluid is an essential tool for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis and is currently essentially based on the use of PCR. Although some consensus is emerging, this molecular diagnosis suffers from a lack of standardization and an extreme diversity of laboratory-developed methods. Commercial kits for the detection of T. gondii by PCR were recently developed and offer certain advantages; however, they must be assessed in comparison with optimized reference PCR assays. The present multicentric study aimed to compare the performances of the Bio-Evolution T. gondii detection kit and laboratory-developed PCR assays set up in eight proficient centers in France. The study compared 157 amniotic fluid samples and found concordances of 99% and 100% using 76 T. gondii-infected samples and 81 uninfected samples, respectively. Moreover, taking into account the classification of the European Research Network on Congenital Toxoplasmosis, the overall diagnostic sensitivity of all assays was identical and calculated to be 86% (54/63); specificity was 100% for all assays. Finally, the relative quantification results were in good agreement between the kit and the laboratory-developed assays. The good performances of this commercial kit are probably in part linked to the use of a number of good practices: detection in multiplicate, amplification of the repetitive DNA target rep529, and the use of an internal control for the detection of PCR inhibitors. The only drawbacks noted at the time of the study were the absence of uracil-N-glycosylase and small defects in the reliability of the production of different reagents.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticAmniotic FluidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, CongenitalReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID25339393
PMCPMC4290938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.