Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339302›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2015

Medullary carcinoma of the colon: can the undifferentiated be differentiated?

Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn, Morten Grauslund, Anders Glenthøj, Linea Cecilie Melchior, Ben Vainer, Gro Linno Willemoe

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Marie Kanstrup FiehnDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Frederik V's Vej 11, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, miakanstrup@hotmail.com.
Morten Grauslund
Anders Glenthøj
Linea Cecilie Melchior
Ben Vainer
Gro Linno Willemoe
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medullary carcinoma of the colon is a rare variant of colorectal cancer claimed to have a more favorable prognosis than conventional adenocarcinomas. The histopathologic appearance may be difficult to distinguish from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic interobserver agreement and to characterize the immunohistochemical and molecular differences between these two subgroups. Fifteen cases initially classified as medullary carcinoma and 30 cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were included. Two pathologists reviewed the slides independently without knowledge of the original diagnosis and subgrouped the tumors into the two entities. Agreement was reached in 31 of 45 cases (69 %) with kappa = 0.32. An extensive immunohistochemical panel was performed, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status was assessed. Of the 31 cases with diagnostic agreement, the expression of only MLH-1 along with corresponding expression of PMS-2 differed significantly (p = 0.04). A high rate of BRAF mutations was detected in both subgroups without significant differences. Expression of MLH-1 was superior in dividing the tumors into two separate entities with significant differences in CK20 (p = 0.005) expression and in the rate of BRAF mutations (p = 0.0035). In conclusion, medullary carcinomas of the colon are difficult to discriminate from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma even with the help of immunohistochemical and molecular analyses. This raises the question whether these morphological subtypes should be maintained or whether an alternative classification of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas based on MLH-1 status rather than morphology should be suggested.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, MedullaryColonic NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1NRAS protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25339302
OpenAlexW2066984107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.