Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339244›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2014

Neurocysticercosis: an update.

Christina M Coyle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Human Neurocysticercosis: An Overview.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fourth ventricle neurocysticercosis: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M CoyleAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York, USA, Christina.Coyle@einstein.yu.edu.
Yeshiva University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is the most common helminthic disease of the nervous system in humans and a major cause of acquired epilepsy worldwide. The presentation of the disease is dependent on both the immunological response of the host against the parasite as well as the location of the encysted organisms within the central nervous system (CNS). The principles of management utilized for intraparenchymal disease cannot be applied to extraparenchymal NCC. An advance in management of intraparenchymal NCC, the most common form encountered by physicians, is the use of both albendazole and praziquantel as a treatment strategy. Patients with subarachnoid NCC (SANCC) require months of treatment with both an antiparasitic agent and steroids to avoid complications such as hydrocephalus and vascular events during treatment. The determinants of successful treatment in SANCC have not been established, but response to therapy can be determined by evaluating several endpoints related to disease evolution including radiographic changes, serum antigen, and CSF antigen. Intraventricular NCC is primarily a surgical disease and data supports minimally invasive endoscopic removal of cysts in many of these patients. NCC is increasingly recognized in non-endemic countries due to increased immigration making it important for physicians to become familiar with the management of this disease.

Identifiers

PMID25339244
OpenAlexW2060951265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.