Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25339235›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2015

Update on neuroimaging phenotypes of mid-hindbrain malformations.

Patrice Jissendi-Tchofo, Mariasavina Severino, Béatrice Nguema-Edzang, Cissé Toure, Gustavo Soto Ares, Anthony James Barkovich

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Congenital brain malformations].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Brain fetal neuroradiology: a beginner's guide.Translational pediatrics · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Quantitative fetal magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cystic posterior fossa malformations.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroimaging Findings in Moebius Sequence.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrice Jissendi-TchofoDepartment of Neuroradiology, MRI 3T Research, Plateforme Imagerie du vivant, IMPRT-IFR 114, University Hospital of Lille (CHRU), 59037, Lille-Cedex, France, jissendi@gmail.com.
Mariasavina Severino
Béatrice Nguema-Edzang
Cissé Toure
Gustavo Soto Ares
Anthony James Barkovich
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuroimaging techniques including structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional positron emission tomography (PET) are useful in categorizing various midbrain-hindbrain (MHB) malformations, both in allowing diagnosis and in helping to understand the developmental processes that were disturbed. Brain imaging phenotypes of numerous malformations are characteristic features that help in guiding the genetic testing in case of direct neuroimaging-genotype correlation or, at least, to differentiate among MHB malformations entities. The present review aims to provide the reader with an update of the use of neuroimaging applications in the fine analysis of MHB malformations, using a comprehensive, recently proposed developmental and genetic classification.

methodsWe have performed an extensive systematic review of the literature, from the embryology main steps of MHB development through the malformations entities, with regard to their molecular and genetic basis, conventional MRI features, and other neuroimaging characteristics.

resultsWe discuss disorders in which imaging features are distinctive and how these features reflect the structural and functional impairment of the brain.

conclusionRecognition of specific MRI phenotypes, including advanced imaging features, is useful to recognize the MHB malformation entities, to suggest genetic investigations, and, eventually, to monitor the disease outcome after supportive therapies.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMesencephalonNervous System MalformationsNeuroimagingRhombencephalon

Identifiers

PMID25339235
OpenAlexW2007068456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.