ArticleBMC health services research2014
"No decision about me without me" in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience.BMC cancer · 2015Pooled it
- Tools for providing information to patients about high-tech medical resources for treatment of cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Review
- Patient-initiated multidisciplinary teams: addressing complex care challenges and enhancing daily life - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Tips for Harnessing the Educational Potential of Tumor Boards for Medical Students.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Participation in Multidisciplinary Teams Among Healthcare Professionals: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Tertiary Public Hospitals in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Registered nurses' views on consideration of patient perspectives during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Observational
- Article
- Expert consensus on organizing the multidisciplinary team (MDT) diagnosis and treatment of hepato-pancreato-biliary diseases in China.Science China. Life sciences · 2022Article
- Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: A narrative review.Cancer medicine · 2022Review
- Exploring non-physician care professionals' roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Team Decisions in Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Service and Quality Evaluation.EJVES vascular forum · 2022Article
- Medical and Nonmedical Information during Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.European radiology · 2021Article
- The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Thyroid Cancer Patients' View of Clinician Professionalism and Multidisciplinary Approach to Their Management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer care is commonly managed by multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) who meet to discuss and agree treatment for individual patients. Patients do not attend MDT meetings but recommendations for treatments made in the meetings directly influence the decision-making process between patients and their responsible clinician. No research to-date has considered patient perspectives (or understanding) regarding MDTs or MDT meetings, though research has shown that failure to consider patient-based information can lead to recommendations that are inappropriate or unacceptable, and can consequently delay treatment.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with current cancer patients from one cancer centre who had either upper gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancer (n = 9) and with MDT members (n = 12) from the teams managing their care. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using Framework approach. Key themes were identified and commonalities and discrepancies within and between individual transcripts and within and between patient and team member samples were identified and examined using the constant comparative method.
resultsPatients had limited opportunities to input to or influence the decision-making process in MDT meetings. Key explanatory factors included that patients were given limited and inconsistent information about MDTs and MDT meetings, and that MDT members had variable definitions of patient-centredness in the context of MDTs and MDT meetings. Patients that had knowledge of medicine (through current/previous employment themselves or that of a close family member) appeared to have greater understanding and access to the MDT. Reassurance emerged as a 'benefit' of informing patients about MDTs and MDT meetings.
conclusionsThere is a need to ensure MDT processes are both efficient and patient-centred. The operationalization of "No decision about me without me" in the context of MDT models of care - where patients are not present when recommendations for treatment are discussed - requires further consideration. Methods for ensuring that patients are actively integrated into the MDT processes are required to ensure patients have an informed choice regarding engagement, and to ensure recommendations are based on the best available patient-based and clinical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.