ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2015
Endogenous temporal and spatial orienting: Evidence for two distinct attentional mechanisms.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linear and nonlinear effects of Spatial and Temporal attention: human data and drift diffusion model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial but not temporal orienting of attention enhances the temporal acuity of human peripheral vision.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Effect of visually cued spatial and temporal attention on audiovisual stimuli processing: an event-related potentials study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Gazing into spatiotemporal 'known unknowns': the influence of uncertainty on pupil size and saccadic eye movements.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Task demand mediates the interaction of spatial and temporal attention.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Goal-Dependent Use of Temporal Regularities to Orient Attention under Spatial and Action Uncertainty.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Attention to space and time: Independent or interactive systems? A narrative review.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Segregation of Brain Structural Networks Supports Spatio-Temporal Predictive Processing.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- If not When, then Where? Ignoring Temporal Information Eliminates Reflexive but not Volitional Spatial Orienting.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The requirement to orient attention in space and time usually occurs simultaneously. Previous reports were indecisive regarding possible interactions between temporal and spatial orienting. The present study examined whether temporal and spatial orienting can operate simultaneously and independently in the framework of a detection task. Participants completed three consecutive target detection tasks: in the first two tasks a central cue provided predictive information regarding either the temporal delay of the target or its spatial location. In a third task the temporal and spatial cues from the first two tasks were combined into a single cue. Temporal and spatial information provided by the combined cue could be valid or invalid for each type of information separately. Results from the combined temporal-spatial task revealed that at a short cue-to-target interval temporal validity effects were significant at the attended and unattended spatial locations and were not modulated by spatial validity conditions. Spatial validity effects were also significant and comparable between the valid and invalid temporal conditions. Moreover, temporal and spatial validity effects in the combined task were equivalent to those attained in the separate tasks. At a long cue-to-target delay, spatial validity effects were significant and were not modulated by temporal validity but there were no temporal validity effects. Overall, the results suggest that participants were able to extract temporal and spatial information provided by a single cue simultaneously and independently. We conclude that temporal and spatial endogenous orienting function orthogonally in a task that does not require demanding perceptual discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25338657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.