ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2015
Learning multisensory representations for auditory-visual transfer of sequence category knowledge: a probabilistic language of thought approach.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Children use algorithm induction to discover patterns in data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Blindfolded hypogravity adaptation differentially affects motor and cognitive systems.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- The cultural origins of symbolic number.Psychological review · 2022Article
- One model for the learning of language.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The computational origin of representation.Minds and machines · 2021Article
- A theory of memory for binary sequences: Evidence for a mental compression algorithm in humans.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- The Child as Hacker.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020Review
- Leveraging Prior Concept Learning Improves Generalization From Few Examples in Computational Models of Human Object Recognition.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- The language of geometry: Fast comprehension of geometrical primitives and rules in human adults and preschoolers.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- From Sensory Signals to Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations: A Probabilistic Language of Thought Approach.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
If a person is trained to recognize or categorize objects or events using one sensory modality, the person can often recognize or categorize those same (or similar) objects and events via a novel modality. This phenomenon is an instance of cross-modal transfer of knowledge. Here, we study the Multisensory Hypothesis which states that people extract the intrinsic, modality-independent properties of objects and events, and represent these properties in multisensory representations. These representations underlie cross-modal transfer of knowledge. We conducted an experiment evaluating whether people transfer sequence category knowledge across auditory and visual domains. Our experimental data clearly indicate that we do. We also developed a computational model accounting for our experimental results. Consistent with the probabilistic language of thought approach to cognitive modeling, our model formalizes multisensory representations as symbolic "computer programs" and uses Bayesian inference to learn these representations. Because the model demonstrates how the acquisition and use of amodal, multisensory representations can underlie cross-modal transfer of knowledge, and because the model accounts for subjects' experimental performances, our work lends credence to the Multisensory Hypothesis. Overall, our work suggests that people automatically extract and represent objects' and events' intrinsic properties, and use these properties to process and understand the same (and similar) objects and events when they are perceived through novel sensory modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25338656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.