ArticlePloS one2014
When did Carcharocles megalodon become extinct? A new analysis of the fossil record.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The extinct marine megafauna of the Phanerozoic.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2024Review
- The Deep Past of the White Shark,Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The extinct sharkScience advances · 2022Article
- A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Early warning signals of infectious disease transitions: a review.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Review
- Biomechanical insights into the dentition of megatooth sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Use of nursery areas by the extinct megatooth sharkBiology letters · 2020Article
- Article
- Regional endothermy as a trigger for gigantism in some extinct macropredatory sharks.PloS one · 2017Article
- Eighty-five million years of Pacific Ocean gyre ecosystem structure: long-term stability marked by punctuated change.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Estimating times of extinction in the fossil record.Biology letters · 2016Review
- Body-size trends of the extinct giant sharkPaleobiology · 2015Article
- Correction: When Did Carcharocles megalodon Become Extinct? A New Analysis of the Fossil Record.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carcharocles megalodon ("Megalodon") is the largest shark that ever lived. Based on its distribution, dental morphology, and associated fauna, it has been suggested that this species was a cosmopolitan apex predator that fed on marine mammals from the middle Miocene to the Pliocene (15.9-2.6 Ma). Prevailing theory suggests that the extinction of apex predators affects ecosystem dynamics. Accordingly, knowing the time of extinction of C. megalodon is a fundamental step towards understanding the effects of such an event in ancient communities. However, the time of extinction of this important species has never been quantitatively assessed. Here, we synthesize the most recent records of C. megalodon from the literature and scientific collections and infer the date of its extinction by making a novel use of the Optimal Linear Estimation (OLE) model. Our results suggest that C. megalodon went extinct around 2.6 Ma. Furthermore, when contrasting our results with known ecological and macroevolutionary trends in marine mammals, it became evident that the modern composition and function of modern gigantic filter-feeding whales was established after the extinction of C. megalodon. Consequently, the study of the time of extinction of C. megalodon provides the basis to improve our understanding of the responses of marine species to the removal of apex predators, presenting a deep-time perspective for the conservation of modern ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.