SynthesisBMJ clinical evidence2014
Dysmenorrhoea.
Synthesis in BMJ clinical evidence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04091789 (A Controlled-Dose Study Using Cannabinoid Combinations in a Rapidly Dissolvable Sublingual Tablet for the Treatment of Dysmenorrhea and Associated Pain Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Controlled-Dose Study Using Cannabinoid Combinations in a Rapidly Dissolvable Sublingual Tablet for the Treatment of Dysmenorrhea and Associated Pain Symptoms
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significant Increase in Depression in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of acupuncture in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- International Clinical Practice Guidelines on Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Dysmenorrhea: Development Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Endometriosis and ovulatory menstruation: beyond the Sampson principle.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Potential Biomarkers of Dysmenorrhea Relief: A MEG Study of Hinoki Aromatherapy and Working Memory.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug resistance in dysmenorrhea: epidemiology, causes, and treatment.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDysmenorrhoea may begin soon after the menarche, after which it often improves with age; or it may originate later in life, after the onset of an underlying causative condition. Dysmenorrhoea is common, and in up to 20% of women it may be severe enough to interfere with daily activities. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of pharmacological treatments for primary dysmenorrhoea? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to December 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
resultsWe found eight studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
conclusionsIn this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: contraceptives (combined oral), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), progestogens (intrauterine), and simple analgesics (aspirin, paracetamol) .
Indexed as
Identifiers
25338194PMC4205951W4302583969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.