Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25338191›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Characterization of inhibitory GABA-A receptor activation during spreading depolarization in brain slice.

Isamu Aiba, C William Shuttleworth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Action Potentials Are Critical for the Propagation of Focally Elicited Spreading Depolarizations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. First FHM3 mouse model shows spontaneous cortical spreading depolarizations.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Article
  7. Impaired COTrends in neurosciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Evidence that adenosine contributes to Leao's spreading depression in vivo.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  11. Mechanisms of Neuronal Silencing After Cortical Spreading Depression.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isamu AibaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
C William ShuttleworthDepartment of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Spreading Depolarizations and Post-Ischemic InjuryR01NS051288 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI SHUTTLEWORTH, CLAUDE W · 2006 to 2014
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS051288NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spreading depolarization (SD) is a slowly propagating wave of near complete depolarizations of neurons and glia. Previous studies have reported large GABA releases during SD, but there is limited understanding of how GABA release and receptor activation are regulated and influence the propagating SD wavefront, as well as an excitatory phase immediately following the passage of SD. The present study characterized GABA-A type receptor (GABAAR) currents during SD generated by KCl microinjection in acute hippocampal slices from adult mice. Spontaneous GABAAR-mediated currents (sIPSCs) were initially enhanced, and were followed by a large outward current at the wavefront. sIPSC were then transiently supressed during the late SD phase, resulting in a significant reduction of the sIPSC/sEPSC ratio. The large outward current generated during SD was eliminated by the GABAAR antagonist gabazine, but the channel potentiator/agonist propofol failed to potentiate the current, likely because of a ceiling effect. Extracellular Cl- decreases recorded during SD were reduced by the antagonist but were not increased by the potentiator. Together with effects of GABAAR modulators on SD propagation rate, these results demonstrate a significant inhibitory role of the initial GABAAR activation and suggest that intracellular Cl- loading is insufficient to generate excitatory GABAAR responses during SD propagation. These results provide a mechanistic explanation for facilitating effects of GABAAR antagonists, and the lack of inhibitory effect of GABAAR potentiators on SD propagation. In addition, selective suppression of GABA transmission in the late SD period and the lack of effect of GABAA modulators on the duration of SD suggests that GABA modulation may not be effective approach to protect neurons during the vulnerable phase of SD.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalGABA AgonistsGABA AntagonistsMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPropofolPyridazinesReceptors, GABA-AGABA AgonistsGABA AntagonistsgabazinePropofolPyridazinesReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID25338191
PMCPMC4206427
OpenAlexW2007886385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.