Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25337643›Full record

ReviewJournal of proteome research2014

Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics.

Navin Rauniyar, John R Yates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 294 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
294citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

294 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Isobaric Labeling Update in MaxQuant.Journal of proteome research · 2025
    Article

234 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Navin RauniyarDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute , 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
John R Yates

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Brain DevelopmentR01MH067880 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI YATES III, JOHN R · 2003 to 2017
$7.1M
Proteomic Profiling of CFTR Protein InteractionR01HL079442 · NHLBI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BALCH, WILLIAM EDWARD, YATES III, JOHN R · 2005 to 2014
$4.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000035CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079442NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079442-09NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry plays a key role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteins in order to understand their functional role in biological systems upon perturbation. In this review, we review studies that examine different aspects of isobaric labeling-based relative quantification for shotgun proteomic analysis. In particular, we focus on different types of isobaric reagents and their reaction chemistry (e.g., amine-, carbonyl-, and sulfhydryl-reactive). Various factors, such as ratio compression, reporter ion dynamic range, and others, cause an underestimation of changes in relative abundance of proteins across samples, undermining the ability of the isobaric labeling approach to be truly quantitative. These factors that affect quantification and the suggested combinations of experimental design and optimal data acquisition methods to increase the precision and accuracy of the measurements will be discussed. Finally, the extended application of isobaric labeling-based approach in hyperplexing strategy, targeted quantification, and phosphopeptide analysis are also examined.

Indexed as

AminesIsotope LabelingMass SpectrometryPhosphopeptidesProtein CarbonylationProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSulfhydryl CompoundsAminesPhosphopeptidesProteomeSulfhydryl Compoundsisobaric labelingisobaric tagsisobaric tags for relative and absolute quantificationiTRAQmass spectrometryquantitative proteomicstandem mass tagsTMT

Identifiers

PMID25337643
PMCPMC4261935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.