Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25337237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Comparison of neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutation status in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Britta Kleist, Marcel Kempa, Michael Novy, Christian Oberkanins, Li Xu, Guojun Li, Christiane Loland, Micaela Poetsch

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Britta KleistDepartment of Pathology, Southern Hospital Trust Kristiansand, Norway.
Marcel KempaInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany.
Michael NovyViennaLab Diagnostics GmbH Vienna, Austria.
Christian OberkaninsViennaLab Diagnostics GmbH Vienna, Austria.
Li XuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA.
Guojun LiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA.
Christiane LolandDepartment of Pathology, Southern Hospital Trust Kristiansand, Norway.
Micaela PoetschInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEHospital of Southern Norway · NOLudwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics · ATThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor tissue has been recognized as an important prerequisite for new targeted therapies. To evaluate the suitability of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue for these treatment approaches and to find a possible link to pretherapeutic conditions of other targeted strategies, we compared neuroendocrine differentiation and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutational status in primary and metastatic CRC. Immunohistochemical expression analysis of neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin was performed on archival CRC tissue, comprising 116 primary tumors, 258 lymph node metastases and 72 distant metastases from 115 patients. All CRC samples but 30 distant metastases were subjected to mutation analysis of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53. Neuroendocrine marker expression was found significantly less frequently in lymph node metastases compared to primary tumors and distant metastases (20%, 31%, 28%, respectively, P = 0.044). KRAS mutation rates increased significantly from primary tumors to lymph node metastases and distant metastases within the neuroendocrine negative CRC group (44%, 53%, 64%, respectively, P = 0.042). Neuroendocrine differentiation was significantly less concordant than KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA/TP53 mutational status in primary tumor/lymph node metastases pairs (65% versus 88%-99%; P < 0.0001) and primary tumor/distant metastases pairs (64% versus 83%-100%; P = 0.027 and P < 0.0001, respectively). According to these data, therapeutic targeting of neuroendocrine tumor cells can be considered only for a subset of CRC patients and biopsies from the metastatic site should be used to guide therapy. A possible importance of lacking neuroendocrine differentiation for progression of KRAS mutant CRC should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMaleBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53colorectal cancerKRAS mutationsNeuroendocrine differentiation

Identifiers

PMID25337237
PMCPMC4203208
OpenAlexW1450355058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.