Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25337222›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

A fine decision tree consisted of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 for cytological diagnosis among reactive mesothelial cells, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion.

Jinhai Yan, Qingzhu Wei, Wenjing Jian, Jianghuan Liu, Hongping Tang, Juan Ge, Jie Zhou, Tong Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinhai YanDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Qingzhu WeiDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Wenjing JianDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Jianghuan LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Hongping TangDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Juan GeDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Tong ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of combination with CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 to differentiate among reactive mesothelial cells (RMs), metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung (LAC) and non-lung (NLAC) origin was investigated by using immunocytochemistry (ICC) and conventional PCR (C-PCR) in pleural effusion. A total of 108 cell blocks (32 RMs, 51 LAC and 25 NLAC were evaluated by ICC for CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 protein expression. In addition, we further performed C-PCR for amplification of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 DNA from 28 specimens (9 MAC and 7 RMs, 6 LAC and 6 NLAC) for molecular diagnosis. CK5/6 staining was observed in the majority of reactive specimens (78.1%) and was rare in adenocarcinoma cells (14.5%), whereas the opposite was true for IMP3 and TTF1. We found a high frequency of TTF1 positivity (76.5%) in LAC, but not in NLAC (4.0%); while there was no significant difference of IMP3 expression in LAC (88.2%) and NLAC (88.0%). The 487 bp DNA fragments of IMP3 was expected to be amplified in 6/9 of adenocarcinoma cases showed negative in ICC; and the 394 bp DNA fragments of CK5/6 was also expected to be amplified in 4/7 of RMs cases showed negative in ICC. Consistent with ICC results, there was significant difference of TTF1 expression in the LAC and NLAC compared with IMP3 expression. The combination with CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 immunostaining appears to be useful to improve the accuracy of cytological diagnoses between RMs, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion. In addition, C-PCR may act as a useful supplemental approach for ICC, especially negative cases in ICC for differential cytological diagnosis.

Indexed as

Decision TreesImmunohistochemistryAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA-Binding ProteinsEpitheliumHumansKeratin-5Keratin-6Lung NeoplasmsPleural Effusion, MalignantPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsIGF2BP3 protein, humanKeratin-5Keratin-6KRT5 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsTTF1 protein, humanadenocarcinomaCK5/6IMP3PCRpleural effusionTTF1

Identifiers

PMID25337222
PMCPMC4203193
OpenAlexW1428427819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.