Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336596›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Effects of electronic health record use on the exam room communication skills of resident physicians: a randomized within-subjects study.

Teresa Taft, Leslie Lenert, Farrant Sakaguchi, Gregory Stoddard, Caroline Milne

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Careful experiments advance the science of informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  9. Paper versus EHR: simplistic comparisons may not capture current reality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teresa TaftDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Leslie LenertBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Farrant SakaguchiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Homer Warner Center, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Gregory StoddardDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Caroline MilneDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS 8UL1TR000105NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025764NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124NLM NIH HHS T15LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of electronic health records (EHRs) on doctor-patient communication are unclear.

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of EHR use compared with paper chart use, on novice physicians' communication skills.

designWithin-subjects randomized controlled trial using observed structured clinical examination methods to assess the impact of use of an EHR on communication.

settingA large academic internal medicine training program. POPULATION: First-year internal medicine residents.

interventionResidents interviewed, diagnosed, and initiated treatment of simulated patients using a paper chart or an EHR on a laptop computer. Video recordings of interviews were rated by three trained observers using the Four Habits scale.

resultsThirty-two residents completed the study and had data available for review (61.5% of those enrolled in the residency program). In most skill areas in the Four Habits model, residents performed at least as well using the EHR and were statistically better in six of 23 skills areas (p<0.05). The overall average communication score was better when using an EHR: mean difference 0.254 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.45), p = 0.012, Cohen's d of 0.47 (a moderate effect). Residents scoring poorly (>3 average score) with paper methods (n = 8) had clinically important improvement when using the EHR. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted in first-year residents in a training environment using simulated patients at a single institution.

conclusionsUse of an EHR on a laptop computer appears to improve the ability of first-year residents to communicate with patients relative to using a paper chart.

Indexed as

CommunicationElectronic Health RecordsInternship and ResidencyPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansInternal MedicineMicrocomputersVideo Recordingelectronic health recordsphysicians in-trainingprovider-patient communicationqualitative researchsimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID25336596
PMCPMC4433374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.