Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336594›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Scalable quality assurance for large SNOMED CT hierarchies using subject-based subtaxonomies.

Christopher Ochs, James Geller, Yehoshua Perl, Yan Chen, Junchuan Xu, Hua Min, James T Case, Zhi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Automated Approach for Identifying Erroneous IS-A Relations in SNOMED CT.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  4. The standard problem.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  5. A deep learning approach to identify missing is-a relations in SNOMED CT.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Leveraging Non-lattice Subgraphs to Audit Hierarchical Relations in NCI Thesaurus.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mining non-lattice subgraphs for detecting missing hierarchical relations and concepts in SNOMED CT.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher OchsComputer Science Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
James GellerComputer Science Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Yehoshua PerlComputer Science Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Yan ChenComputer Information Systems Department, BMCC, CUNY, New York, New York, USA.
Junchuan XuDivision of Knowledge Informatics, NYU, New York, New York, USA.
Hua MinDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
James T CaseNLM/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Zhi WeiComputer Science Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

A family-based framework of quality assurance for biomedical ontologiesR01CA190779 · NCI · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PERL, YEHOSHUA · 2015 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStandards terminologies may be large and complex, making their quality assurance challenging. Some terminology quality assurance (TQA) methodologies are based on abstraction networks (AbNs), compact terminology summaries. We have tested AbNs and the performance of related TQA methodologies on small terminology hierarchies. However, some standards terminologies, for example, SNOMED, are composed of very large hierarchies. Scaling AbN TQA techniques to such hierarchies poses a significant challenge. We present a scalable subject-based approach for AbN TQA.

methodsAn innovative technique is presented for scaling TQA by creating a new kind of subject-based AbN called a subtaxonomy for large hierarchies. New hypotheses about concentrations of erroneous concepts within the AbN are introduced to guide scalable TQA.

resultsWe test the TQA methodology for a subject-based subtaxonomy for the Bleeding subhierarchy in SNOMED's large Clinical finding hierarchy. To test the error concentration hypotheses, three domain experts reviewed a sample of 300 concepts. A consensus-based evaluation identified 87 erroneous concepts. The subtaxonomy-based TQA methodology was shown to uncover statistically significantly more erroneous concepts when compared to a control sample. DISCUSSION: The scalability of TQA methodologies is a challenge for large standards systems like SNOMED. We demonstrated innovative subject-based TQA techniques by identifying groups of concepts with a higher likelihood of having errors within the subtaxonomy. Scalability is achieved by reviewing a large hierarchy by subject.

conclusionsAn innovative methodology for scaling the derivation of AbNs and a TQA methodology was shown to perform successfully for the largest hierarchy of SNOMED.

Indexed as

ClassificationSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineHemorrhageHumansNeoplasmsQuality Controlabstraction networkscalable quality assuranceSNOMED CTstandards quality assurancesubject-based terminology quality assuranceterminology quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID25336594
PMCPMC6283060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.