Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336593›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Assessing the role of a medication-indication resource in the treatment relation extraction from clinical text.

Cosmin Adrian Bejan, Wei-Qi Wei, Joshua C Denny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. DrugWAS: Drug-wide Association Studies for COVID-19 Drug Repurposing.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PheMap: a multi-resource knowledge base for high-throughput phenotyping within electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  8. Overcoming cancer therapeutic bottleneck by drug repurposing.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automating the generation of lexical patterns for processing free text in clinical documents.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cosmin Adrian BejanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Wei-Qi WeiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joshua C DennyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
From GWAS to PheWAS: Scanning the EMR Phenome for Gene-disease AssociationsR01LM010685 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASTARACHE, LISA · 2011 to 2022
$6.3M
Informatics Tools for Pharmacogenomic Discovery using Practice-based DataR01GM103859 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U19 HL065962NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103859NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010685NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450-12PHS HHS ULTR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the contribution of the MEDication Indication (MEDI) resource and SemRep for identifying treatment relations in clinical text. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe first processed clinical documents with SemRep to extract the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts and the treatment relations between them. Then, we incorporated MEDI into a simple algorithm that identifies treatment relations between two concepts if they match a medication-indication pair in this resource. For a better coverage, we expanded MEDI using ontology relationships from RxNorm and UMLS Metathesaurus. We also developed two ensemble methods, which combined the predictions of SemRep and the MEDI algorithm. We evaluated our selected methods on two datasets, a Vanderbilt corpus of 6864 discharge summaries and the 2010 Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2)/Veteran's Affairs (VA) challenge dataset.

resultsThe Vanderbilt dataset included 958 manually annotated treatment relations. A double annotation was performed on 25% of relations with high agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.86). The evaluation consisted of comparing the manual annotated relations with the relations identified by SemRep, the MEDI algorithm, and the two ensemble methods. On the first dataset, the best F1-measure results achieved by the MEDI algorithm and the union of the two resources (78.7 and 80, respectively) were significantly higher than the SemRep results (72.3). On the second dataset, the MEDI algorithm achieved better precision and significantly lower recall values than the best system in the i2b2 challenge. The two systems obtained comparable F1-measure values on the subset of i2b2 relations with both arguments in MEDI.

conclusionsBoth SemRep and MEDI can be used to extract treatment relations from clinical text. Knowledge-based extraction with MEDI outperformed use of SemRep alone, but superior performance was achieved by integrating both systems. The integration of knowledge-based resources such as MEDI into information extraction systems such as SemRep and the i2b2 relation extractors may improve treatment relation extraction from clinical text.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsSemanticsUnified Medical Language SystemAlgorithmsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalKnowledge BasesRxNormPharmaceutical PreparationsMEDInatural language processingSemReptreatment relation extraction

Identifiers

PMID25336593
PMCPMC5901126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.