Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336538›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2015

Quality of care for OA: the effect of a point-of-care consultation recording template.

John J Edwards, Kelvin P Jordan, George Peat, John Bedson, Peter R Croft, Elaine M Hay, Krysia S Dziedzic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John J EdwardsArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK j.j.edwards@keele.ac.uk.
Kelvin P JordanArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.
George PeatArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.
John BedsonArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.
Peter R CroftArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.
Elaine M HayArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.
Krysia S DziedzicArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-018Department of Health IAT/I-PF/010/009Department of Health KMRF-2014-03-002Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this study were to determine the feasibility of introducing a computerized template for identifying quality of care during an OA consultation, describe quality of OA care in practices in which the template was introduced and assess the effect of the template on routinely recorded clinician behaviour in those practices.

methodsA computerized template to assist the recording of care in consultations for patients with OA was installed in eight general practices. Eligible patients were those ≥45 years of age consulting for clinical OA during a 6 month period. The main outcomes were frequency of template triggering, achievement of quality indicators during the consultation (assessment of pain and function, assessment for first-line analgesics, provision of information, exercise advice, consideration of physiotherapy referral, weight loss advice) and change in routinely recorded clinician behaviour (diagnostic coding, prescribing, referral, use of radiography, weight records) compared with the 12 months prior to template installation.

resultsThe template was triggered for 1730 patients. Achievement of indicators ranged from 36% (for consideration of physiotherapy referral) to 63% (for pain assessment), with substantial variability between clinicians. There was an increase in prescription of recommended first-line analgesics following the template installation: paracetamol [odds ratio (OR) 1.49 (95% CI 1.22, 1.82) compared with pre-template] and topical NSAIDs [OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.61, 2.35)].

conclusionThis new template is a feasible tool for capturing data during OA consultations to aid assessment of quality of care. It was associated with significant improvements in recommended care processes. However, strategies are needed to ensure consistent approaches between clinicians.

trial registrationhttp://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN06984617/mosaics.

Indexed as

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedPoint-of-Care SystemsQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisPatient Education as TopicPatient Outcome AssessmentPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrimary Health CareAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalcomputerizedmedical record systemsosteoarthritisprimary carequality indicatorreminder systems

Identifiers

PMID25336538
PMCPMC4416084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.