ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
Statistical significance of variables driving systematic variation in high-dimensional data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
139 citing papers in PubMed.
- The petal identity geneeLife · 2026Article
- Integrated Mendelian Randomization and Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveal T Cell Immune Mechanisms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Bladder Cancer Comorbidity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GAPDH nuclear signaling regulates neutrophil migration and inflammatory skin responses.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Transcriptional response of spermathecal secretory cells to mating and receipt of seminal fluid proteins iniScience · 2026Article
- An epithelial cell fate-driven predictive model for liver metastasis risk in primary colorectal cancer through single-cell and multi-omics integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic Reprogramming of PDGFRA-Expressing Stromal Cells Facilitates WNT-Driven Transformation by Promoting a Fetal-Like State in the Intestinal Epithelium.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Single-nucleus sequencing and spatial metabolomics analysis reveal the regulatory mechanism of ginkgolic acid biosynthesis in the episperm ofHorticulture research · 2026Article
- Exploring the developmental mechanisms of tea plant trichomes using genomics and single-cell transcriptome sequencing.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic disruption and hypoactivity in DYT-SGCE medial ganglionic eminence-patterned inhibitory neurons.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Micronuclei and Nuclear Abnormalities in Oral Mucosa as Indicators of Genotoxicity in Healthcare Professionals.Toxics · 2026Article
- Key Concepts in Transcriptomics Data Analysis in the Era of Next-Gen Sequencing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Changes in neural progenitor lineage composition during astrocytic differentiation of human iPSCs.eLife · 2025Article
- Mapping the peripheral immune landscape of Parkinson's disease patients with single-cell sequencing.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Calpain-2-Mediated Endothelial Focal Adhesion Disruption in Thoracic Aortic Dissection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- RFC1 regulates the expansion of neural progenitors in the developing zebrafish cerebellum.Nature communications · 2025Article
- In vitro generation of a ureteral organoid from pluripotent stem cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrative analysis of bulk and single-cell gene expression profiles to identify bone marrow mesenchymal cell heterogeneity and prognostic significance in multiple myeloma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThere are a number of well-established methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) for automatically capturing systematic variation due to latent variables in large-scale genomic data. PCA and related methods may directly provide a quantitative characterization of a complex biological variable that is otherwise difficult to precisely define or model. An unsolved problem in this context is how to systematically identify the genomic variables that are drivers of systematic variation captured by PCA. Principal components (PCs) (and other estimates of systematic variation) are directly constructed from the genomic variables themselves, making measures of statistical significance artificially inflated when using conventional methods due to over-fitting.
resultsWe introduce a new approach called the jackstraw that allows one to accurately identify genomic variables that are statistically significantly associated with any subset or linear combination of PCs. The proposed method can greatly simplify complex significance testing problems encountered in genomics and can be used to identify the genomic variables significantly associated with latent variables. Using simulation, we demonstrate that our method attains accurate measures of statistical significance over a range of relevant scenarios. We consider yeast cell-cycle gene expression data, and show that the proposed method can be used to straightforwardly identify genes that are cell-cycle regulated with an accurate measure of statistical significance. We also analyze gene expression data from post-trauma patients, allowing the gene expression data to provide a molecularly driven phenotype. Using our method, we find a greater enrichment for inflammatory-related gene sets compared to the original analysis that uses a clinically defined, although likely imprecise, phenotype. The proposed method provides a useful bridge between large-scale quantifications of systematic variation and gene-level significance analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R software package, called jackstraw, is available in CRAN. CONTACT: jstorey@princeton.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.