ArticleBrain connectivity2015
Inhibitory behavioral control: a stochastic dynamic causal modeling study using network discovery analysis.
Article in Brain connectivity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lorcaserin modulation of semantic drug cue-elicited effective brain connectivity in persons with cocaine and opioid use disorders.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Altered effective connectivity of the default mode network in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Impact of data processing varieties on DCM estimates of effective connectivity from task-fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- A serotonergic biobehavioral signature differentiates cocaine use disorder participants administered mirtazapine.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Parallel cortical-brainstem pathways to attentional analgesia.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Decreased effective connection from the parahippocampal gyrus to the prefrontal cortex in Internet gaming disorder: A MVPA and spDCM study.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020Article
- Dynamic Causal Modeling of Insular, Striatal, and Prefrontal Cortex Activities During a Food-Specific Go/NoGo Task.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019Article
- Altered anterior cingulate cortex to hippocampus effective connectivity in response to drug cues in men with cocaine use disorder.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2018Article
- The functional architectures of addition and subtraction: Network discovery using fMRI and DCM.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- Clinically Anxious Individuals Show Disrupted Feedback between Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Prefrontal-Limbic Control Circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Inhibitory behavioral control: A stochastic dynamic causal modeling study comparing cocaine dependent subjects and controls.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2015Article
- Impaired Frontal-Basal Ganglia Connectivity in Male Adolescents with Conduct Disorder.PloS one · 2015Article
- Effect of cocaine dependence on brain connections: clinical implications.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2015Review
- Social support influences effective neural connections during food cue processing and overeating: A bottom-up pathway.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to study the effective (directional) neuronal connectivity underlying inhibitory behavioral control. fMRI data were acquired from 15 healthy subjects while they performed a Go/NoGo task with two levels of NoGo difficulty (Easy and Hard NoGo conditions) in distinguishing spatial patterns of lines. Based on the previous inhibitory control literature and the present fMRI activation results, 10 brain regions were postulated as nodes in the effective connectivity model. Due to the large number of potential interconnections among these nodes, the number of models for final analysis was reduced to a manageable level for the whole group by conducting DCM Network Discovery, which is a recently developed option within the Statistical Parametric Mapping software package. Given the optimum network model, the DCM Network Discovery analysis found that the locations of the driving input into the model from all the experimental stimuli in the Go/NoGo task were the amygdala and the hippocampus. The strengths of several cortico-subcortical connections were modulated (influenced) by the two NoGo conditions. Specifically, connectivity from the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) to hippocampus was enhanced by the Easy condition and further enhanced by the Hard NoGo condition, possibly suggesting that compared with the Easy NoGo condition, stronger control from MFG was needed for the hippocampus to discriminate/learn the spatial pattern in order to respond correctly (inhibit), during the Hard NoGo condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.