Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336209›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Amphetamine in adolescence disrupts the development of medial prefrontal cortex dopamine connectivity in a DCC-dependent manner.

Lauren M Reynolds, Carolina S Makowski, Sandra V Yogendran, Silke Kiessling, Nicolas Cermakian, Cecilia Flores

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transsynaptic cerebellin 4-neogenin 1 signaling mediates LTP in the mouse dentate gyrus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M Reynolds1] Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada [2] Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Carolina S Makowski1] Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada [2] Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sandra V Yogendran1] Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada [2] Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Silke KiesslingDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Nicolas CermakianDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cecilia Flores1] Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada [2] Department of Psychiatry and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initiation of drug use during adolescence is a strong predictor of both the incidence and severity of addiction throughout the lifetime. Intriguingly, adolescence is a period of dynamic refinement in the organization of neuronal connectivity, in particular medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dopamine circuitry. The guidance cue receptor, DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), is highly expressed by dopamine neurons and orchestrates their innervation to the mPFC during adolescence. Furthermore, we have shown that amphetamine in adolescence regulates DCC expression in dopamine neurons. Drugs in adolescence may therefore induce their enduring behavioral effects via DCC-mediated disruption in mPFC dopamine development. In this study, we investigated the impact of repeated exposure to amphetamine during adolescence on both the development of mPFC dopamine connectivity and on salience attribution to drug context in adulthood. We compare these effects to those induced by adult exposure to an identical amphetamine regimen. Finally, we determine whether DCC signaling within dopamine neurons is necessary for these events. Exposure to amphetamine in adolescence, but not in adulthood, leads to an increase in the span of dopamine innervation to the mPFC, but a reduction of presynaptic sites present on these axons. Amphetamine treatment in adolescence, but not in adulthood, also produces an increase in salience attribution to a previously drug-paired context in adulthood. Remarkably, DCC signaling within dopamine neurons is required for both of these effects. Drugs of abuse in adolescence may therefore induce their detrimental behavioral consequences by disrupting mesocortical dopamine development through alterations in the DCC signaling cascade.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnimalsCell CountCell SizeConditioning, PsychologicalDCC ReceptorDopamineDopamine AgentsDopaminergic NeuronsMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityNerve Growth FactorsNetrin-1Neural PathwaysNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal CortexAmphetamineDcc protein, mouseDCC ReceptorDopamineDopamine AgentsNerve Growth FactorsNetrin-1Receptors, Cell SurfaceRNA, MessengerTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25336209
PMCPMC4367452
OpenAlexW2004779185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.