Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336144›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2015

Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo.

S Connor Dennis, Cory J Berkland, Lynda F Bonewald, Michael S Detamore

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immunohistochemical Analysis of CCN2 in Experimental Fracture Healing Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Acceleration of Bone Regeneration Induced by a Soft-Callus Mimetic Material.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  18. Effect of Urolithin A on Bone Repair in Mice with Bone Defects.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Connor Dennis1Bioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Cory J Berkland1Bioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Lynda F Bonewald4Department of Oral Biology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Michael S Detamore1Bioengineering Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
University of Kansas · US

Funding

PHARMACEUTICAL ASPECTS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAININGT32GM008359 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SIAHAAN, TERUNA J., VOLKIN, DAVID · 1989 to 2018
$5.0M
Integrative colloidal gels for cranial defect repairR01DE022472 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI BERKLAND, CORY · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Gradient-based strategy for osteochondral regenerationR01AR056347 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056347NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022472NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM-08359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous bone grafting (ABG) remains entrenched as the gold standard of treatment in bone regenerative surgery. Consequently, many marginally successful bone tissue engineering strategies have focused on mimicking portions of ABG's "ideal" osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic composition resembling the late reparative stage extracellular matrix (ECM) in bone fracture repair, also known as the "hard" or "bony" callus. An alternative, less common approach that has emerged in the last decade harnesses endochondral (EC) ossification through developmental engineering principles, which acknowledges that the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in developmental skeletogenesis, specifically EC ossification, are closely paralleled during native bone healing. EC ossification naturally occurs during the majority of bone fractures and, thus, can potentially be utilized to enhance bone regeneration for nearly any orthopedic indication, especially in avascular critical-sized defects where hypoxic conditions favor initial chondrogenesis instead of direct intramembranous ossification. The body's native EC ossification response, however, is not capable of regenerating critical-sized defects without intervention. We propose that an underexplored potential exists to regenerate bone through the native EC ossification response by utilizing strategies which mimic the initial inflammatory or fibrocartilaginous ECM (i.e., "pro-" or "soft" callus) observed in the early reparative stage of bone fracture repair. To date, the majority of strategies utilizing this approach rely on clinically burdensome in vitro cell expansion protocols. This review will focus on the confluence of two evolving areas, (1) native ECM biomaterials and (2) developmental engineering, which will attempt to overcome the technical, business, and regulatory challenges that persist in the area of bone regeneration. Significant attention will be given to native "raw" materials and ECM-based designs that provide necessary osteo- and chondro-conductive and inductive features for enhancing EC ossification. In addition, critical perspectives on existing stem cell-based therapeutic strategies will be discussed with a focus on their use as an extension of the acellular ECM-based designs for specific clinical indications. Within this framework, a novel realm of unexplored design strategies for bone tissue engineering will be introduced into the collective consciousness of the regenerative medicine field.

Indexed as

AnimalsBioengineeringBone RegenerationExtracellular MatrixFracture HealingFractures, BoneOsteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID25336144
PMCPMC4442558
OpenAlexW1944287377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.