ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2015
Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxygen‑sensing histone demethylase KDM6A modulates chondrocyte‑to‑osteoblast transdifferentiation by activating the Wnt/β‑catenin pathway.International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 improves motor function after traumatic brain injury in a rat model.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Treatment of large bone defects in load-bearing bone: traditional and novel bone grafts.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Review
- From Bone To Blood Flow: Tissue Engineering In Orthopedics - A Narrative Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Development of bioactive solid-foam scaffolds from decellularized cartilage with chondrogenic and osteogenic properties.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Endochondral Ossification for Spinal Fusion: A Novel Perspective from Biological Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Experimental long bone fracture healing in goats with cockle shell-based calcium carbonate bone paste.Veterinary and animal science · 2024Article
- Exploring calcium-free alternatives in endochondral bone repair tested onRegenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Multifunctional coatings of nickel-titanium implant toward promote osseointegration after operation of bone tumor and clinical application: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Mussel-inspired cortical bone-adherent bioactive composite hydrogels promote bone augmentation through sequential regulation of endochondral ossification.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- A Comparison of In Vivo Bone Tissue Generation Using Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes in a Novel 3D Printed Four-Chamber Periosteal Bioreactor.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Repair of osteochondral defects: efficacy of a tissue-engineered hybrid implant containing both human MSC and human iPSC-cartilaginous particles.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Regeneration of Humeral Head Using a 3D Bioprinted Anisotropic Scaffold with Dual Modulation of Endochondral Ossification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of CCN2 in Experimental Fracture Healing Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Close-to-native bone repair via tissue-engineered endochondral ossification approaches.iScience · 2022Review
- On the horizon: Hedgehog signaling to heal broken bones.Bone research · 2022Review
- Acceleration of Bone Regeneration Induced by a Soft-Callus Mimetic Material.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Effect of Urolithin A on Bone Repair in Mice with Bone Defects.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Mineralization in a Critical Size Bone-Gap in Sheep Tibia Improved by a Chitosan-Calcium Phosphate-Based Composite as Compared to Predicate Device.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A timeseries analysis of the fracture callus extracellular matrix proteome during bone fracture healing.Journal of life sciences (Westlake Village, Calif.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous bone grafting (ABG) remains entrenched as the gold standard of treatment in bone regenerative surgery. Consequently, many marginally successful bone tissue engineering strategies have focused on mimicking portions of ABG's "ideal" osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic composition resembling the late reparative stage extracellular matrix (ECM) in bone fracture repair, also known as the "hard" or "bony" callus. An alternative, less common approach that has emerged in the last decade harnesses endochondral (EC) ossification through developmental engineering principles, which acknowledges that the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in developmental skeletogenesis, specifically EC ossification, are closely paralleled during native bone healing. EC ossification naturally occurs during the majority of bone fractures and, thus, can potentially be utilized to enhance bone regeneration for nearly any orthopedic indication, especially in avascular critical-sized defects where hypoxic conditions favor initial chondrogenesis instead of direct intramembranous ossification. The body's native EC ossification response, however, is not capable of regenerating critical-sized defects without intervention. We propose that an underexplored potential exists to regenerate bone through the native EC ossification response by utilizing strategies which mimic the initial inflammatory or fibrocartilaginous ECM (i.e., "pro-" or "soft" callus) observed in the early reparative stage of bone fracture repair. To date, the majority of strategies utilizing this approach rely on clinically burdensome in vitro cell expansion protocols. This review will focus on the confluence of two evolving areas, (1) native ECM biomaterials and (2) developmental engineering, which will attempt to overcome the technical, business, and regulatory challenges that persist in the area of bone regeneration. Significant attention will be given to native "raw" materials and ECM-based designs that provide necessary osteo- and chondro-conductive and inductive features for enhancing EC ossification. In addition, critical perspectives on existing stem cell-based therapeutic strategies will be discussed with a focus on their use as an extension of the acellular ECM-based designs for specific clinical indications. Within this framework, a novel realm of unexplored design strategies for bone tissue engineering will be introduced into the collective consciousness of the regenerative medicine field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.