Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25336141›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Understanding patients' and doctors' attitudes about shared decision making for advance care planning.

Negin Hajizadeh, Lauren M Uhler, Rafael E Pérez Figueroa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Negin HajizadehDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Lauren M UhlerDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Rafael E Pérez FigueroaDepartment of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, & Prevention Studies, The Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Institute on Hispanic Drug AbuseR25DA026401 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALDEZ, AVELARDO · 2009 to 2019
$3.2M
Mentored Career Development in Comparative Effectiveness ResearchK12HS019473 · AHRQ · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BRAITHWAITE, RONALD SCOTT · 2010 to 2010
$2.1M
Spread the Word: Integrating Clinical Prediction Rules at the Point of CareR24HS022061 · AHRQ · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI MCGINN, THOMAS G · 2013 to 2015
$900k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS019473AHRQ HHS K12 HS019473-01AHRQ HHS R24 HS022061NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA026401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough shared decision making (SDM) is the preferred model of making complex treatment decisions with patients, patients' and doctors' attitudes towards SDM for advance care planning are unknown.

objectiveWe sought to: (i) gain general insights into the current practice of SDM and attitudes about patient involvement, and (ii) gain specific insights into experience with, and attitudes about, SDM for advance care planning.

designQualitative analysis of face-to-face semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND

participantsPatients with chronic lung disease and their doctors at a New York City public hospital.

resultsAlthough patients described participation in decision making, many deferred the final decision to their doctors. Doctors indicated a preference for SDM but expressed barriers including perceived lack of patient understanding and lack of patient empowerment. With regard to end-of-life discussions, patients were generally open to having these discussions with their doctors, although their openness sometimes depended on the circumstance (i.e. end-of-life discussions may be more acceptable to patients for whom the chance of dying is high). Doctors reported engaging in end-of-life treatment decisions with their patients, although expressed the need for conversations to take place earlier, in advance of acute illness, and identified a lack of prognostic estimates as one barrier to engaging in this discussion.

conclusionsDoctors should explore their patients' attitudes regarding end-of-life discussions and preferences for decision-making styles. There is a need for tools such as decision aids which can empower patients to participate in decision making and can support doctors with prognostic estimates pertinent to individual patients.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsChronic DiseaseCommunicationDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansLung DiseasesPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceQualitative Researchadvance care planningend of lifeshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID25336141
PMCPMC5810719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.