ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015
Understanding patients' and doctors' attitudes about shared decision making for advance care planning.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicians' experiences and actions in making complex level-of-care decisions during acute situations within older patients' homes: a critical incident study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Best-Worst Scaling Survey of Inpatients' Preferences in Medical Decision-Making Participation in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Is This ACP? A Focus Group Study of Patient Experiences of Advance Care Planning.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- General practitioners' views of advance care planning: a questionnaire-based study.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- When do Physicians and Nurses Start Communication about Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study at an Acute Care Hospital in Japan.Asian bioethics review · 2020Article
- Barriers to advance care planning: a qualitative study of seriously ill Chinese patients and their families.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Experienced barriers in shared decision-making behaviour of orthopaedic surgery residents compared with orthopaedic surgeons.Musculoskeletal care · 2019Article
- Does Calculated Prognostic Estimation Lead to Different Outcomes Compared With Experience-Based Prognostication in the ICU? A Systematic Review.Critical care explorations · 2019Review
- Shared decision making and experiences of patients with long-term conditions: has anything changed?BMC health services research · 2018Article
- "I Just Felt Like I Was Stuck in the Middle": Physician Assistants' Experiences Communicating With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Families in the Acute Care Setting.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2017Article
- InformedTogether: Usability Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Advance Care Planning for Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.JMIR human factors · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough shared decision making (SDM) is the preferred model of making complex treatment decisions with patients, patients' and doctors' attitudes towards SDM for advance care planning are unknown.
objectiveWe sought to: (i) gain general insights into the current practice of SDM and attitudes about patient involvement, and (ii) gain specific insights into experience with, and attitudes about, SDM for advance care planning.
designQualitative analysis of face-to-face semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND
participantsPatients with chronic lung disease and their doctors at a New York City public hospital.
resultsAlthough patients described participation in decision making, many deferred the final decision to their doctors. Doctors indicated a preference for SDM but expressed barriers including perceived lack of patient understanding and lack of patient empowerment. With regard to end-of-life discussions, patients were generally open to having these discussions with their doctors, although their openness sometimes depended on the circumstance (i.e. end-of-life discussions may be more acceptable to patients for whom the chance of dying is high). Doctors reported engaging in end-of-life treatment decisions with their patients, although expressed the need for conversations to take place earlier, in advance of acute illness, and identified a lack of prognostic estimates as one barrier to engaging in this discussion.
conclusionsDoctors should explore their patients' attitudes regarding end-of-life discussions and preferences for decision-making styles. There is a need for tools such as decision aids which can empower patients to participate in decision making and can support doctors with prognostic estimates pertinent to individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.