Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25335963›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy augmentation in major depression treatment (ECAM study): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Atsuo Nakagawa, Mitsuhiro Sado, Dai Mitsuda, Daisuke Fujisawa, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Takayuki Abe, Yuji Sato, Satoru Iwashita, Masaru Mimura, Yutaka Ono

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Atsuo NakagawaCenter for Clinical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-2571
Mitsuhiro SadoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Dai MitsudaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke FujisawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki KikuchiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki AbeCenter for Clinical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji SatoCenter for Clinical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru IwashitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Sakuragaoka Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka OnoNational Center for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPKyorin University · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMajor depression is a serious mental disorder that causes substantial distress and impairment in individuals and places an enormous burden on society. Although antidepressant treatment is the most common therapy provided in routine practice, there is little evidence to guide second-line therapy for patients who have failed to respond to antidepressants. The aim of this paper is to describe the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial that measures the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as an augmentation strategy to treat patients with non-psychotic major depression identified as suboptimal responders to usual depression care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The current study is a 16-week assessor-blinded randomised, parallel-groups superiority trial with 12-month follow-up at an outpatient clinic as part of usual depression care. Patients aged 20-65 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Major Depressive Disorder who have experienced at least one failed trial of antidepressants as part of usual depression care, will be randomly assigned to receive CBT plus treatment as usual, or treatment as usual alone. The primary outcome is the change in clinician-rated 17-item GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) score at 16 weeks, and secondary outcomes include severity and change in scores of subjective depression symptoms, proportion of responders and remitters, safety and quality of life. The primary population will be the intention-to-treat patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All protocols and the informed consent form comply with the Ethics Guideline for Clinical Research (Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). Ethics review committees at the Keio University School of Medicine and the Sakuragaoka Memorial Hospital approved the study protocol. The results of the study will be disseminated at several research conferences and as published articles in peer-reviewed journals. The study will be implemented and reported in line with the CONSORT statement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000001218.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntidepressive Agentsclinical protocolscognitive behavior therapymajor depressive disorderrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID25335963
PMCPMC4208050
OpenAlexW2158269224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.