Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25335945›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2015

Evaluation of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites in the urine of e-cigarette users versus cigarette smokers.

Stephen S Hecht, Steven G Carmella, Delshanee Kotandeniya, Makenzie E Pillsbury, Menglan Chen, Benjamin W S Ransom, Rachel Isaksson Vogel, Elizabeth Thompson, Sharon E Murphy, Dorothy K Hatsukami

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Five-Day Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure Among Adult Smokers After Completely Switching From Combustible Cigarettes to a Nicotine-Salt Pod System.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure Decrease After Smokers Switch to an E-Cigarette or Nicotine Gum.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  12. Biomarkers of Exposure Among "Dual Users" of Tobacco Cigarettes and Electronic Cigarettes in Canada.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Comparing brain absorption and lung deposition of nicotine salts and free-base e-cigarettes: insights from [Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen S HechtTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN hecht002@umn.edu.
Steven G CarmellaTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Delshanee KotandeniyaTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Makenzie E PillsburyTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Menglan ChenTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Benjamin W S RansomTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Rachel Isaksson VogelTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Elizabeth ThompsonTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Sharon E MurphyTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Dorothy K HatsukamiTobacco Research Programs and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HEATHER Hammond NELSON · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
METABOLISM OF CARCINOGENIC TOBACCO SPECIFIC NITROSAMINESR01CA081301 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI STEPHEN S HECHT · 1999 to 2026
$7.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA77598NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081301NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are rapidly increasing in popularity but little information is available on their potential toxic or carcinogenic effects.

methodsTwenty-eight e-cigarette smokers who had not smoked tobacco cigarettes for at least 2 months provided urine samples which were analyzed by validated methods for a suite of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites including 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), 3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (3-HPMA), 2-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (2-HPMA), 3-hydroxy-1-methylpropylmercapturic acid (HMPMA), S-phenylmercapturic acid (SPMA), nicotine, and cotinine. Levels of these compounds were compared to those found in cigarette smokers from three previous studies.

resultsLevels of 1-HOP, total NNAL, 3-HPMA, 2-HPMA, HMPMA, and SPMA were significantly lower in the urine of e-cigarette users compared to cigarette smokers. Levels of nicotine and cotinine were significantly lower in e-cigarette users compared to cigarette smokers in one study but not in another.

conclusionsWith respect to the compounds analyzed here, e-cigarettes have a more favorable toxicity profile than tobacco cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAcetylcysteineAdultCarcinogensCotinineFemaleHazardous SubstancesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineNitrosaminesPyrenesPyridinesSmoking1-hydroxypyrene3-hydroxy-1-methylpropylmercapturic acid4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butan-1-olAcetylcysteineCarcinogensCotinineHazardous SubstancesNicotineNitrosaminesPyrenesPyridinesS-(3-hydroxypropyl)cysteine N-acetateS-phenyl-N-acetylcysteine

Identifiers

PMID25335945
PMCPMC4481723
OpenAlexW1988060475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.