Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25335464›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2015

Comparative FAIRE-seq analysis reveals distinguishing features of the chromatin structure of ground state- and primed-pluripotent cells.

Matthew Murtha, Francesco Strino, Zeynep Tokcaer-Keskin, N Sumru Bayin, Doaa Shalabi, Xiangmei Xi, Yuval Kluger, Lisa Dailey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genomic methods in profiling DNA accessibility and factor localization.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew MurthaDepartment of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Microbiology Kimmel Center for Stem Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Francesco Strino
Zeynep Tokcaer-Keskin
N Sumru Bayin
Doaa Shalabi
Xiangmei Xi
Yuval Kluger
Lisa Dailey
New York University · USYale University · US

Funding

Training Program in Stem Cell and Cancer BiologyT32CA160002 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEHMANN, RUTH · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1T32CA160002NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs), established from preimplantation murine blastocysts, and epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs), established from postimplantation embryos, can self-renew in culture or differentiate into each of the primary germ layers. While the core transcription factors (TFs) OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG are expressed in both cell types, the gene expression profiles and other features suggest that ESCs and EpiSCs reflect distinct developmental maturation stages of the epiblast in vivo. Accordingly, "naïve" or "ground state" ESCs resemble cells of the inner cell mass, whereas "primed" EpiSCs resemble cells of the postimplantation egg cylinder. To gain insight into the relationship between naïve and primed pluripotent cells, and of each of these pluripotent states to that of nonpluripotent cells, we have used FAIRE-seq to generate a comparative atlas of the accessible chromatin regions within ESCs, EpiSCs, multipotent neural stem cells, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. We find a distinction between the accessible chromatin patterns of pluripotent and somatic cells that is consistent with the highly related phenotype of ESCs and EpiSCs. However, by defining cell-specific and shared regions of open chromatin, and integrating these data with published gene expression and ChIP analyses, we also illustrate unique features of the chromatin of naïve and primed cells. Functional studies suggest that multiple stage-specific enhancers regulate ESC- or EpiSC-specific gene expression, and implicate auxiliary TFs as important modulators for stage-specific activation by the core TFs. Together these observations provide insights into the chromatin structure dynamics accompanying transitions between these pluripotent states.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell LineChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyEmbryonic Stem CellsMiceMultipotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription FactorsAccessible chromatinEnhancersGene expressionPluripotent stem cellsTranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID25335464
PMCPMC4304912
OpenAlexW1912028369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.