Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25335081›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Injection of fully-defined signal mixtures: a novel high-throughput tool to study neuronal encoding and computations.

Vladimir Ilin, Ian H Stevenson, Maxim Volgushev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortical Specializations Underlying Fast Computations.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vladimir IlinDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Ian H StevensonDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Maxim VolgushevDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

The role of heterosynaptic plasticity in achieving stable yet adaptable memory stR01MH087631 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI VOLGUSHEV, MAXIM · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of how neurons transform fluctuations of membrane potential, reflecting input activity, into spike responses, which communicate the ultimate results of single-neuron computation, is one of the central challenges for cellular and computational neuroscience. To study this transformation under controlled conditions, previous work has used a signal immersed in noise paradigm where neurons are injected with a current consisting of fluctuating noise that mimics on-going synaptic activity and a systematic signal whose transmission is studied. One limitation of this established paradigm is that it is designed to examine the encoding of only one signal under a specific, repeated condition. As a result, characterizing how encoding depends on neuronal properties, signal parameters, and the interaction of multiple inputs is cumbersome. Here we introduce a novel fully-defined signal mixture paradigm, which allows us to overcome these problems. In this paradigm, current for injection is synthetized as a sum of artificial postsynaptic currents (PSCs) resulting from the activity of a large population of model presynaptic neurons. PSCs from any presynaptic neuron(s) can be now considered as "signal", while the sum of all other inputs is considered as "noise". This allows us to study the encoding of a large number of different signals in a single experiment, thus dramatically increasing the throughput of data acquisition. Using this novel paradigm, we characterize the detection of excitatory and inhibitory PSCs from neuronal spike responses over a wide range of amplitudes and firing-rates. We show, that for moderately-sized neuronal populations the detectability of individual inputs is higher for excitatory than for inhibitory inputs during the 2-5 ms following PSC onset, but becomes comparable after 7-8 ms. This transient imbalance of sensitivity in favor of excitation may enhance propagation of balanced signals through neuronal networks. Finally, we discuss several open questions that this novel high-throughput paradigm may address.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsElectrodesExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsIn Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsMicroscopy, VideoNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, WistarSaltsSynaptic TransmissionVisual CortexExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsSalts

Identifiers

PMID25335081
PMCPMC4204817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.