Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25333798›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Large outbreak caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71 in a Finnish Veterinary Teaching Hospital--from outbreak control to outbreak prevention.

Thomas Grönthal, Arshnee Moodley, Suvi Nykäsenoja, Jouni Junnila, Luca Guardabassi, Katariina Thomson, Merja Rantala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Emergence of methicillin resistantFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Analyses of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Isolation and Identification ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas GrönthalCentral Laboratory, Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Arshnee MoodleyDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Suvi NykäsenojaFood and Feed Microbiology Research Unit, Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Helsinki, Finland.
Jouni Junnila4Pharma Ltd., Espoo, Finland.
Luca GuardabassiDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katariina ThomsonVeterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Merja RantalaCentral Laboratory, Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Copenhagen · DKFinnish Food Authority · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to describe a nosocomial outbreak caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) ST71 SCCmec II-III in dogs and cats at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Helsinki in November 2010 - January 2012, and to determine the risk factors for acquiring MRSP. In addition, measures to control the outbreak and current policy for MRSP prevention are presented.

methodsData of patients were collected from the hospital patient record software. MRSP surveillance data were acquired from the laboratory information system. Risk factors for MRSP acquisition were analyzed from 55 cases and 213 controls using multivariable logistic regression in a case-control study design. Forty-seven MRSP isolates were analyzed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and three were further analyzed with multi-locus sequence and SCCmec typing.

resultsSixty-three MRSP cases were identified, including 27 infections. MRSPs from the cases shared a specific multi-drug resistant antibiogram and PFGE-pattern indicated clonal spread. Four risk factors were identified; skin lesion (OR = 6.2; CI95% 2.3-17.0, P = 0.0003), antimicrobial treatment (OR = 3.8, CI95% 1.0-13.9, P = 0.0442), cumulative number of days in the intensive care unit (OR = 1.3, CI95% 1.1-1.6, P = 0.0007) or in the surgery ward (OR = 1.1, CI95% 1.0-1.3, P = 0.0401). Tracing and screening of contact patients, enhanced hand hygiene, cohorting and barrier nursing, as well as cleaning and disinfection were used to control the outbreak. To avoid future outbreaks and spread of MRSP a search-and-isolate policy was implemented. Currently nearly all new MRSP findings are detected in screening targeted to risk patients on admission.

conclusionMultidrug resistant MRSP is capable of causing a large outbreak difficult to control. Skin lesions, antimicrobial treatment and prolonged hospital stay increase the probability of acquiring MRSP. Rigorous control measures were needed to control the outbreak. We recommend the implementation of a search-and-isolate policy to reduce the burden of MRSP.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsCross InfectionDisease OutbreaksDog DiseasesDogsFinlandHospitals, AnimalMethicillin ResistanceStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID25333798
PMCPMC4198203
OpenAlexW2088502076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.