ArticlePloS one2014
Mismatch negativity (MMN) in freely-moving rats with several experimental controls.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Residual Language Abilities Correlate With Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Computational Modelling of Novelty Detection in the Mismatch Negativity Protocols and Its Impairments in Schizophrenia.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Sex- and etiology-specific effects on predictive processing in the inferior colliculus of two rat models of autism.Communications biology · 2026Article
- The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Computational modelling of novelty detection in the mismatch negativity protocols and its impairments in schizophrenia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Contextual auditory processing in the inferior colliculus is affected in a sex- and age-dependent manner in the valproic acid-induced rat model of autism.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Evidence for Auditory Stimulus-Specific Adaptation But Not Deviance Detection in Larval Zebrafish Brains.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
- Contextualised Processing of Stimuli Modulates Auditory Mismatch Responses in the Rat.Clinical EEG and neuroscience · 2025Article
- Deviance detection and regularity sensitivity in dissociated neuronal cultures.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- EVIDENCE FOR AUDITORY STIMULUS-SPECIFIC ADAPTATION BUT NOT DEVIANCE DETECTION IN LARVAL ZEBRAFISH BRAINS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Two Prediction Error Systems in the Nonlemniscal Inferior Colliculus: "Spectral" and "Nonspectral".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mismatch Negativity (MMN) as a Pharmacodynamic/Response Biomarker for NMDA Receptor and Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance-Targeted Treatments in Schizophrenia.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Short-term neuronal and synaptic plasticity act in synergy for deviance detection in spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Robust multisensory deviance detection in the mouse parietal associative area.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Why mismatch negativity continues to hold potential in probing altered brain function in schizophrenia.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Review
- Spatiotemporal dynamics across visual cortical laminae support a predictive coding framework for interpreting mismatch responses.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- The effect of schizophrenia risk factors on mismatch responses in a rat model.Psychophysiology · 2023Article
- Decoding violated sensory expectations from the auditory cortex of anaesthetised mice: Hierarchical recurrent neural network depicts separate 'danger' and 'safety' units.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Corticofugal regulation of predictive coding.eLife · 2022Article
- Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a scalp-recorded electrical potential that occurs in humans in response to an auditory stimulus that defies previously established patterns of regularity. MMN amplitude is reduced in people with schizophrenia. In this study, we aimed to develop a robust and replicable rat model of MMN, as a platform for a more thorough understanding of the neurobiology underlying MMN. One of the major concerns for animal models of MMN is whether the rodent brain is capable of producing a human-like MMN, which is not a consequence of neural adaptation to repetitive stimuli. We therefore tested several methods that have been used to control for adaptation and differential exogenous responses to stimuli within the oddball paradigm. Epidural electroencephalographic electrodes were surgically implanted over different cortical locations in adult rats. Encephalographic data were recorded using wireless telemetry while the freely-moving rats were presented with auditory oddball stimuli to assess mismatch responses. Three control sequences were utilized: the flip-flop control was used to control for differential responses to the physical characteristics of standards and deviants; the many standards control was used to control for differential adaptation, as was the cascade control. Both adaptation and adaptation-independent deviance detection were observed for high frequency (pitch), but not low frequency deviants. In addition, the many standards control method was found to be the optimal method for observing both adaptation effects and adaptation-independent mismatch responses in rats. Inconclusive results arose from the cascade control design as it is not yet clear whether rats can encode the complex pattern present in the control sequence. These data contribute to a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that rat brain is indeed capable of exhibiting human-like MMN, and that the rat model is a viable platform for the further investigation of the MMN and its associated neurobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.