Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25333481›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Fixational eye movement correction of blink-induced gaze position errors.

Francisco M Costela, Jorge Otero-Millan, Michael B McCamy, Stephen L Macknik, Xoana G Troncoso, Ali Najafian Jazi, Sharon M Crook, Susana Martinez-Conde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microsaccade Direction Reveals the Variation in Auditory Selective Attention Processes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reply to van Ede: Pulling on the threads of microsaccades and attention: What's left?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Microsaccades are directed toward the midpoint between targets in a variably cued attention task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microsaccade generation requires a foveal anchor.Journal of eye movement research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco M CostelaBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Graduate program in Neuroscience, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Jorge Otero-MillanBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Michael B McCamyBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Stephen L MacknikBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.
Xoana G TroncosoBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Unité de Neuroscience, Information et Complexité (CNRS-UNIC), UPR CNRS 3293, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ali Najafian JaziBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Sharon M CrookSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Susana Martinez-CondeBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our eyes move continuously. Even when we attempt to fix our gaze, we produce "fixational" eye movements including microsaccades, drift and tremor. The potential role of microsaccades versus drifts in the control of eye position has been debated for decades and remains in question today. Here we set out to determine the corrective functions of microsaccades and drifts on gaze-position errors due to blinks in non-human primates (Macaca mulatta) and humans. Our results show that blinks contribute to the instability of gaze during fixation, and that microsaccades, but not drifts, correct fixation errors introduced by blinks. These findings provide new insights about eye position control during fixation, and indicate a more general role of microsaccades in fixation correction than thought previously.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlinkingEye MovementsHumansMacaca mulattaOcular Physiological PhenomenaVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID25333481
PMCPMC4205003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.