ArticleRadiology2015
Glioblastoma treated with concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy: differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Article in Radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of amide proton transfer imaging to differentiate true progression from therapy-related changes in gliomas and metastases.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Discriminators of pseudoprogression and true progression in high-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in stratifying gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2019Pooled it
- MR perfusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of high-grade gliomas after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhancement Parameters between Gadobutrol and Gadoterate Meglumine in Posttreatment Glioma: A Prospective Intraindividual Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Trial
- Early response evaluation of radiosurgery in intracranial meningiomas: insights from dynamic contrast‑enhanced MRI.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The diagnostic and prognosis value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI distributed parameter model andNeuroradiology · 2026Article
- Diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space may serve as a potential biomarker for differentiating glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression: a preliminary study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning enhances reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in diffuse gliomas: bypassing post-processing and providing uncertainty maps.European radiology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Multiparametric Dynamic Contrast Imaging for Voxelwise Quantitative Assessment of Brain Tumors.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Detecting pseudo versus true progression of glioblastoma via accurate quantitative DCE-MRI using point-of-care portable perfusion phantoms: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Radiomics of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Predicting Radiation-Induced Hepatic Toxicity After Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Machine Learning Predictive Model Based on the SHAP Methodology.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- ASL, DSC, DCE perfusion MRI and 18F-DOPA PET/CT in differentiating glioma recurrence from post-treatment changes.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Structural and practical identifiability of contrast transport models for DCE-MRI.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using MRI and PET Imaging in Gliomas: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review of tracer kinetic models in evaluation of gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Imaging Role in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Response Prediction Associated with High-grade Glioma.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2024Review
- Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Treated Glioblastoma: A Pictorial Essay.Cancers · 2023Review
- Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the role of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma on the basis of findings in entirely newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesions after concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters obtained at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, such as the volume transfer constant (K(trans)), the extravascular extracellular space per unit volume of tissue(ve), and the blood plasma volume per unit volume of tissue(vp). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective study had institutional review board approval; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-three patients with histopathologically proven glioblastoma who had undergone concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide were included. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived pharmacokinetic parameters, including K(trans), ve, and vp, were calculated for newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesions. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between the true progression (n = 17) and pseudoprogression (n = 16) groups by using unpaired t tests and then multivariable analysis.
resultsThe mean K(trans) and ve were higher in the true progression group than in the pseudoprogression group (mean K(trans), 0.44 min(-1) ± 0.25 [standard deviation] and 0.23 min(-1) ± 0.10 for true progression and pseudoprogression groups, respectively, P = .004; and mean ve, 1.26 ± 0.78 and 0.75 ± 0.49 for true progression and pseudoprogression groups, respectively, P = .034). Multivariable analysis showed that mean K(trans) was the only independently differentiating variable (P = .004).
conclusionDynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived pharmacokinetic parameters, including K(trans) and ve, in the entire newly developed or enlarged enhancing lesion may be useful objective diagnostic tools in the differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma who have undergone concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25333475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.